Search results
-
N
Which Synology product? Suggestions please ...
It depends on your storage requirement, if you will be having 10-15 tb of data, a 5 bay like 1512+ would be suitable, if you just need a nas for backup, speed and size capacity isn't a requirement, go for 212+, but with current hdd maxing out at 3-4 tb, running it with raid 1, that's the... -
N
SHR raid volume crash, due to wrong disk order
Hi travisco_nabisco, you are right, i had my NAS rescued by Synology support team whom remote into my system. I'm elated that they are able to revive my volumn, but they were not able to provide me with the procedures. But anyhow if anyone of you had the same mistake as i did, just wait for... -
N
stream from DS1512+ to PCH A-110
There will be 3 particular folder that you have to use if you want to enable DLNA on 1512+ Video Photo Music These are the default directory that any DLNA client like popcorn would be able to see when you try to access to it. Needless to say, you don't even have to give guest account... -
N
SHR raid volume crash, due to wrong disk order
I did the ulitmate newbie mistake, by interswapping disk 3 and 4 after doing some cleaning up of dust in the NAS. I have a total of 5 hdd, and a crash volume, disk 3 and 4 has failed. I have contact synology for support, but is wondering what are my chances and have anyone here made the... -
N
Volume raid 5 or synology SHR
The performance hit is usually minimal if you are not using it for high traffic hits. Most of the time i still find the bottle neck is still with the network instead of the CPU utilz -
N
Volume raid 5 or synology SHR
Base on my experience with 1010+ it takes almost 24 hrs for a single 2TB hdd add on to my SHR 5 with 3 hdd. it sure saves me alot of trouble of copying the data out before rebuilding. -
N
FYI- Synology launches DSM 4 (the NAS OS)
Well this is normal for non IT people, they just use it to their convienience, while we have worry about security and data theft and loss. It just takes 1 disgrunted stuff to grab some customer data and probably it's avail somewhere else. But anyhow i've been using the new DSM version... -
N
1010+ Slow Transfer 40-50MB/s
Hi 00Roush, I don't think so WD EARS20 is the limiting factor, i have seen some benchies around getting easily 100+ mb/s and futher more running on raid 5. My computer would simply max out first. But i'm just kinda of disapointed it so low. I have tried to do a hdtune on my computer hdd... -
N
1010+ Slow Transfer 40-50MB/s
Thanks NTM1275 your results is similiar to what i am getting. For my CPU specs. Maybe in a couple of months i will get a i7, it seems so much faster. -
N
1010+ Slow Transfer 40-50MB/s
Thanks guys for the advice. But i see also the testbed is using a core 2 duo and it's able to reach 100mb++. So i thought if i can reach at least 80mb+ it wouldn't be so bad :( I'll try running a raid 0 on my computer and see if that helps abit :) -
N
1010+ Slow Transfer 40-50MB/s
I'm using a 2009 MBP P7750 with 4GB Ram with OCZ Summit 2 120GB Yeap, all Cat 6 cables, max length 2 meter Jumbo frame is enabled at 9000 on all possible network config Yeap latest drivers used :( I still can't figure out what is my limitation. I access the NAS via Map folders on Windows... -
N
1010+ Slow Transfer 40-50MB/s
Heres my setup. AMD Phenom II X4 925 400GB WD Blue Asus M2NPV-VM Windows 7 64 Bit Onboard NIC Additional Intel PCI-X GB CT Desktop NIC Network Setup Linksys SD2005 Switch Belkin F5D8235-4 Synology DS1010+ with DSM 3.0 1372 5 X 2 TB WD EARS Setup in Raid 5. Formatted with the...