Menu
What's new
By:
Filters Better Search

Search results

  • SNBForums Code of Conduct

    SNBForums is a community for everyone, no matter what their level of experience.

    Please be tolerant and patient of others, especially newcomers. We are all here to share and learn!

    The rules are simple: Be patient, be nice, be helpful or be gone!

  1. got_milk

    Fork 380.57 HGG-FINAL

    Well said. I'm also interested to see what happens when radios in people's routers begin failing as they were running out of spec...the RT-AC87U has plenty of cooling issues already with stock firmware. :)
  2. got_milk

    Fork 380.57 HGG-FINAL

    I have, numerous times both publicly in these threads and via PM. He either refuses to answer, or makes an excuse about how he cannot upload the source code due to "lack of time". EDIT: Just to expand on this - I do not care what hggomes does with his fork. While I disagree with boosting the TX...
  3. got_milk

    Fork 380.57 HGG-FINAL

    I do stand corrected on this: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Theft It does not change the fact that code is being taken from projects without proper attribution.
  4. got_milk

    Fork 380.57 HGG-FINAL

    He is knowingly and without reservation in violation of the license agreement attached to the source code. I really don't understand the logic of "nobody else is doing it, so shut up" that a few users have taken around this thread. It is theft, that is not a deniable fact, and this fork will...
  5. got_milk

    Fork 380.57 HGG-FINAL

    Yet it does not answer my primary question: how does the state of the code prevent it from being committed and uploaded to GitHub?
  6. got_milk

    Fork 380.57 HGG-FINAL

    I really do not believe people continue to defend the nonsensical reasons for not uploading the source code. Code cleanup? Not only is it not required, it is not asked for by anyone requesting the source. If the code is truly that "messy", then it raises concerns to me about the quality of the...
  7. got_milk

    Fork 380.57 HGG-FINAL

    How does the state of the code prevent it from being committed and uploaded to GitHub? He already has one. He used to contribute to these threads and post builds publicly until he repeatedly lied about the timeframe when the source would be released, then stopped posting and instead moved to...
  8. got_milk

    Fork 380.57 HGG-FINAL

    I don't understand where the logic of demanding people to do better comes from? It is not a matter of doing better, it is a matter of security risks (as the firmware is 8MB larger than other forks, it raises significant valid questions as to what additions which remain a secret have been made to...
  9. got_milk

    Fork 380.57 HGG-FINAL

    If you're continually demanding users of this forum to build their own forks, why don't you? Lead by example? If you don't care for the topic at hand then ignore the discussion, instead of making pointless and unrealistic demands. The legality and safety of this firmware fork is a reasonable...
  10. got_milk

    Fork 380.57 HGG-FINAL

    Take a deep breath and calm down, please. The title of this thread is "Fork 380.57 HGG-FINAL". I think a discussion on the legality of the firmware is in scope of this thread.
  11. got_milk

    Unofficial Build 380.58

    I would be patient and wait for Eric to release a beta build. There could be issues post-merge that he has yet to resolve.
  12. got_milk

    Greetings from backstage

    Take care Eric, hopefully everything works out for the best for you. We'll be here when you come back. Being 100% is most important.
  13. got_milk

    Fork 380.57 HGG-FINAL

    Violating FCC regulations is not justification to break a license (GPL or otherwise). I have tried my best to obtain a copy of the source from @hggomes on numerous occasions in the past on this forum to no avail, with his most recent claims of "I don't have time, but I will soon" being outright...
  14. got_milk

    [Bug] Adaptive QoS does not properly classify traffic

    I've discovered an issue with Adaptive QoS where it improperly prioritizes traffic, degrading internet access across my whole network. When downloading games from Steam, Adaptive QoS does classify the traffic as "Valve Steam" but treats the traffic as if it were a game being played, not a large...
  15. got_milk

    Adaptive QoS - Questions

    Just curious why HFSC is better than HTB? IIRC, most fq-codel articles I've seen have recommended HTB over HFSC.
  16. got_milk

    [Beta] RT-AC87U/RT-AC3200 9.0.0.4_378_9481 Beta for checking bug in Traffic Analyzer -> Statistic

    I don't think making demands towards ASUS developers like that is a proper way to approach this issue...there are processes the code must go through before a full release can be made, including QA and proper release processes. These can take days, even weeks to complete. ASUS would not invest...
  17. got_milk

    [Beta] RT-AC87U/RT-AC3200 9.0.0.4_378_9481 Beta for checking bug in Traffic Analyzer -> Statistic

    I agree but disagree somewhat with this sentiment - I own two RT-AC87Us and feel the same as many users on this forum do that the 5GHz radio was extremely broken upon release of this router and still does not perform to a reasonable standard today. We are very lucky however to now have not only...
  18. got_milk

    [Beta] RT-AC87U 9.0.0.4.378.9110

    We shouldn't be pushing for timelines for beta releases (or for new features). I think we're lucky that we have an ASUS rep willing to work with us and share beta firmwares for our feedback. We do seem to be getting closer to a stable product, and ASUS is at least still willing to try to work on...
  19. got_milk

    [Beta] RT-AC87U 9.0.0.4.378.9110

    Devil's advocate: these betas are bringing some much needed stability to the 5GHz network with the RT-AC87U. I'm using two of these routers (one routing, one as a wireless bridge) and my choices for anything resembling reliability are these newest betas (with their own set of issues) or the...
  20. got_milk

    [Beta] RT-AC87U_3.0.0.4_378_8248 Unofficial Beta

    For those who plan on testing this firmware, can someone test to see if the latency issues have been worked on? I've noticed up until the latest beta firmwares that while 2.4GHz connections hover around the 1ms latency mark (sometimes sub-1ms) between client and router, 5GHz connections are much...
Top