Search results

The Intransa studies were done primarily for internal consumption, Intransa had an internal system configurator application that would allow SE's to punch in how many cameras the customer intended to support and what kind of bandwidth they were (VGA, 720p, etc.), then it would spit out how much...

If you're talking about Linux, the single most useful tool we used when qual'ing hardware for camera capacity at Intransa was latencytop, followed by iostat. On the windows side of things, perfmon gives you a lot of good stats, queue depth is the most important one. dstat gives a nice overview...