Search results

The error message comes from your browser, not pixelserv. It just says pixelserv is working as expected, but your browser is missing a setting or an authorisation to accept the certificate deemed invalid until proven otherwise. Restore from your previous usb key the CA files and place them on...

It's might be related to a website address the app must access, preventing it to continue if it wasn't able to do so. In this case, you need to check the latest queries in your dns server log after trying to load the app, and compare with the sites you're blocking. There could be one you have...

At first, I assumed it was due to the scanning tools I'm using, but the information was missing because the used VM didn't do any tracing to /var/log/. Since it was actived, I'm also seeing a lot of OPTIONS, and given the time, I could trace it back to Firefox. Here's the information related to...

this one : => network monitoring and mapping, based on nmap use nmap itself, or any network scanning tool : it's the usual behavior when a webserver is scanned, as the OPTION method given informations about the webserver capabilities.

@kvic , I think I've nailed one source for potential pixelserv-tls crashes : Jul 5 16:23:57 box user.info kernel: pixelserv.x86.p[5979]: segfault at 0 ip 0815a211 sp b6bfdedc error 4 in pixelserv.x86.performance.static[8048000+245000] Version ...

The main problem is that you're dealing with SSL certificates, and everything related to this is not simple, either on purpose or because people behind didn't try to. When you're using a self-signed certificate, either you register it in a single application (usually the browser), or into the...

pixelserv can't remove them : it's part of the page. Only a plugin in the browser is able to do so, like adblock, and might not always be successful. Using pixelserv prevent sites to load additionnal ressources, but if the page itself has a placeholder designed, it'll stay. The main point is...

Good Then, as you have a redirect for doubleclick, if you open a page to http://doubleclick.net/test.gif , do you get the image ? (pixeserv adapt to the request, asking for / give a blank page, asking for any image will give the 1x1 image) If yes, you have it working correctly, the next part is...

First thing : pixelserv is only here to serve a 1*1 pixel, you need a dns to intercept the dns request and redirect them to pixelserv. I don't see one in your recap Second, having a blank/missing image is normal, if you block the image itself. You need to add to your dns the address of the ads...

@kvic Could you comment in Makefile, the line #100 running the $(UPX) command in the x86 build ? It's one of the last still present, and not much usefull for this architecture This minor detail aside, Ki is working fine, thanks :)

If it's a Windows system, yeah, since Vista, Microsoft borked the NTP client : it doesn't play nice with a non-Windows computer as NTP source, as it still expects it to work like a Windows server would. To fix it, I finally nailed it yesterday : you need to run this command under an admin...

Tried the new build, and ... whoops : The certificate will not be valid until tuesday 6 september 2016 18:42. The current time is tuesday 6 september 2016 18:41. Error code: MOZILLA_PKIX_ERROR_NOT_YET_VALID_CERTIFICATE Kidding, I have just a slight delay with the workstation, always being 2...

For the x86 build : package commands are for ubuntu 16.04, x64, but for other distributions, this could help : http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/compile-32bit-application-using-gcc-64-bit-linux.html - first, the gcc x86 prereq : sudo apt-get install lib32ncurses5 lib32z1 g++-multilib sudo apt-get...

Thanks. Compiled as x86 binary without error, I'll post under the how-to And effectively build the chain information. But it is incomplete. pixelserv-tls only use the CN= from the CA intermediate cert to build the chain, and give this as a result : openssl s_client -connect doubleclick.net:443...

No rush, but if needed I can test, and compile it directly : I had to build a x86 version from the Kh release. VMware has some trouble running low ressources distribs in x64 mode, and ask for more than double memory requirement just to boot the kernel (ie : around 100+ mb when 44mb is enough)...

np, I'm running one for some times, and completly forgot about the fact thoses sites are heavy on it. I don't mind ads, everybody need to eat, but it has grown so much rampant it's becoming very unsettling

Thanks for making this, nice to get a lighter browsing experience. Took me some hours but I was able to get it running on a tiny core linux VM. By the way, I'm experiencing a problem with the certificates : while they are correctly generated, they are missing the certificate chain information...