What's new

asus GT-BE98 or BT-BE96u

  • SNBForums Code of Conduct

    SNBForums is a community for everyone, no matter what their level of experience.

    Please be tolerant and patient of others, especially newcomers. We are all here to share and learn!

    The rules are simple: Be patient, be nice, be helpful or be gone!

fre_

New Around Here
I’m in the market for a new router as a replacement of my Asus AX86u. (I need VLAN and this option is not supported)

Beside this AX86u as a router, I have two (AI-mesh) Asus Zenwifi XT12 nodes that are connected as a wired backhaul to my router.

Because I’m already in the Asus ecosystem, I tend to stay with Asus for my new router.

The two options I’m considering are:

  • GT-BE98 (non-pro), which has 2,4 Ghz, 5Ghz-1, 5Ghz-2 and 6Ghz
  • BT-BE96u which has 2,4 Ghz, 5 Ghz and 6 Ghz
The BE98 uses band-splitting in the 5 Ghz band, the BE96u not.

I tend to be consistent with my 2 Asus XT12 nodes, which also have bandsplitting in the 5 Ghz band. (not sure about this logic, but I expect a better compatibility because of the same bandsplitting functionality)

But on the other hand, the BE-96u without bandsplitting would be better energy-efficient.

In fact, my real question is: When one combines a router (2.4 GHz and 5 GHz - no bandsplitting) in a wired mesh setup with another router as a node (2.4 GHz, 5 GHz-1, and 5 GHz-2 - bandsplitting), are all the bands of the node effectively (and efficiently) used?
Or is it better that all equipment (router + nodes) in the network have the same structure (2.4 GHz, 5 GHz-1, and 5 GHz-2)?

Anyone has an idea?
 

Similar threads

Latest threads

Support SNBForums w/ Amazon

If you'd like to support SNBForums, just use this link and buy anything on Amazon. Thanks!

Sign Up For SNBForums Daily Digest

Get an update of what's new every day delivered to your mailbox. Sign up here!
Top