twitchyzero
Regular Contributor
Got my hands on the AS1002T budget NAS a week ago...ASUS' sub $200 offering
I pretty much pulled the trigger blind. Pre-ordered it last month when it was announced with absolutely no customer reviews or reviews from the usual suspects.
quick specs:
Marvell ARM M7 Dual-core 1GHz
512MB DDR3
gigE, 2 USB3
Tool-less design
only sips a few watts when disks are hiberating
more deets here:
http://www.asustor.com/product?p_id=42#tab3
I'm running 2X8TB RAID 1 which operates quite loud, but NAS is self is very quiet unless it's booting up.
This is my first NAS so I have no other point of reference but the UI was simple yet very responsive. The settings are really robust and in depth ( you can even choose which LEDs you want on and its brightness. I like the backup option of allowing even your external HDD to spindown, so you can just set a schedule and forget about it). Schedulable SMART and bad sector tests are handy to have for a peace of mind. It's like they took all of RMerlin's work and incoropated it into the ADM OS.
When I was transferring the USB3 over ~150GB files it was running around 75MB/s
when I was moving roughly 3.5TB it dropped down to 28MB/s so needless to say it took about 2 days to have that done. Didn't test the network speed.
To my surprise, using its uPnP Media Server, Blu-ray remux 25Mbps mkv playbacks on my smart TV was smooth. Plex server did not work, I don't believe that plays nice with ARM processors simply because they're too weak for transcoding-on-the-fly
Looks like Guru3d released their review and it was very favourable. The rest you can read there as it's way more methodical.
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/asustor_as1002t_nas_review,1.html
Now some noob questions about drive longevity:
I understand Archive SMR HDDs aren't meant for NAS/RAID, but I'm wondering if it's best to keep the drives' orientation parallel to the floor or to have the nas stand up right as the nas was designed but the drives will be vertical?
RAID 1 reads doesn't always happen simultaneously to both drive. Does that mean in theory 1 drive will wear out faster than the other drive?
Cheers.
I pretty much pulled the trigger blind. Pre-ordered it last month when it was announced with absolutely no customer reviews or reviews from the usual suspects.
quick specs:
Marvell ARM M7 Dual-core 1GHz
512MB DDR3
gigE, 2 USB3
Tool-less design
only sips a few watts when disks are hiberating
more deets here:
http://www.asustor.com/product?p_id=42#tab3
I'm running 2X8TB RAID 1 which operates quite loud, but NAS is self is very quiet unless it's booting up.
This is my first NAS so I have no other point of reference but the UI was simple yet very responsive. The settings are really robust and in depth ( you can even choose which LEDs you want on and its brightness. I like the backup option of allowing even your external HDD to spindown, so you can just set a schedule and forget about it). Schedulable SMART and bad sector tests are handy to have for a peace of mind. It's like they took all of RMerlin's work and incoropated it into the ADM OS.
When I was transferring the USB3 over ~150GB files it was running around 75MB/s
when I was moving roughly 3.5TB it dropped down to 28MB/s so needless to say it took about 2 days to have that done. Didn't test the network speed.
To my surprise, using its uPnP Media Server, Blu-ray remux 25Mbps mkv playbacks on my smart TV was smooth. Plex server did not work, I don't believe that plays nice with ARM processors simply because they're too weak for transcoding-on-the-fly
Looks like Guru3d released their review and it was very favourable. The rest you can read there as it's way more methodical.
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/asustor_as1002t_nas_review,1.html
Now some noob questions about drive longevity:
I understand Archive SMR HDDs aren't meant for NAS/RAID, but I'm wondering if it's best to keep the drives' orientation parallel to the floor or to have the nas stand up right as the nas was designed but the drives will be vertical?
RAID 1 reads doesn't always happen simultaneously to both drive. Does that mean in theory 1 drive will wear out faster than the other drive?
Cheers.
Last edited: