On the mailing list, Simon was lamenting the risks of implementing security fixes in secret before public disclosure, and the lack of a beta period. I see his point. They're on the right trail now, so it won't be long.Not good.
On the mailing list, Simon was lamenting the risks of implementing security fixes in secret before public disclosure, and the lack of a beta period. I see his point. They're on the right trail now, so it won't be long.Not good.
Actually, this was just a bad decision IMHO. My understanding is that the fix causing the problem was a performance enhancement. Shouldn't mix those with a high visibility security update.On the mailing list, Simon was lamenting the risks of implementing security fixes in secret before public disclosure, and the lack of a beta period. I see his point. They're on the right trail now, so it won't be long.
That jpg file is not readable.
Use the Insert 'Code' tool to copy the contents of the pdf instead.
I believe it was in response to this vulnerability, but I don't want to pretend I know what I'm really talking about when we get to this level of detail.Actually, this was just a bad decision IMHO. My understanding is that the fix causing the problem was a performance enhancement. Shouldn't mix those with a high visibility security update.
CVE-2020-25686: Dnsmasq does not check for an existing pending request for the same name and forwards a new request thus allowing an attacker to perform a "Birthday Attack" scenario to forge replies and potentially poison the DNS cache
Me neither....if my understanding is wrong, I stand corrected.I believe it was in response to this vulnerability, but I don't want to pretend I know what I'm really talking about when we get to this level of detail.
I use 6rd on Centurylink and I can not configure it on the current beta 4b. When I enter, "2602::", under IPv6 Prefix, I get a popup saying "2602:: is not a valid IP address!". It worked on every other previous version prior to beta4. Beta4 and 4b are broken as well as the current Asus firmware 41700.
View attachment 29760View attachment 29761
Better crashlog...
So I thought and have been reading online. Found a similar log here (https://www.snbforums.com/attachments/syslog-txt.28070/) but cannot find the original post on the site for it.The crash occured in the daemon that handles multicasting. Check that you don't have something flooding your network with broadcasts or something. Nothing more that can be done about it, that daemon is part of the Broadcom SDK.
I upgraded from 384.19 to the beta with no issues. Just backup your current config in case you experience any issues. You can always go back.I currently have 384.19 on my routers. Is it still safe to go straight from 384.19 to the 386 beta4?
Or would I be better off waiting for the release of 386 as non beta version?
I currently have 384.19 on my routers. Is it still safe to go straight from 384.19 to the 386 beta4?
Or would I be better off waiting for the release of 386 as non beta version?
Here's my take on beta software. It's fun to give it a spin and be part of the early crowd, but don't install beta software on a system you're not prepared to do a nuclear reset on and go back to something that worked before. If you can handle that and can take an outage, then fill your boots. Both me and my wife work from home now and our teenage daughter is doing on-line school at home so consistent net access is key or else I'm in the dog house. I'll upgrade a few APs but keep my primary router on a stable platform. FWIW, the 4b Beta has been solid and fine for me so far on my APs. I have not used it on any device in a router mode yet.I currently have 384.19 on my routers. Is it still safe to go straight from 384.19 to the 386 beta4?
Or would I be better off waiting for the release of 386 as non beta version?
Any new word on the DNSmasq patch ?
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!