Hi,
i have just assembled a new fileserver machine .
im using 4 x 2TB samsung drive in RAID 5.
the operating system is a minimal netinstall of debian 6.0 amd64 installed on a 4Gb usb drive .
the raid drives are a single partition in etx4 mounted under /home
im testing it using a 4,5 Gb file.
the client machine is a simple windows with RAID 0 drives on it .
as shown in the picture :
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
copying the FROM client TO server i obtain around 95% network usage .
if i copy intead FROM server TO client the network usage drop to 65% .
so there is bottleneck somewhere ?
or is it the normal behaviour ?
if it is normal , why it happen ?
my hardware setup should be enough to fulfill the bandwith right ?
why it doesnt happen copying the data back from the server to the client ?
thx in advance for help
NOTE :
-same situtaion happen also using the raid 5 cloud for both operating systema and area storage .
-the network link is 1Gbs ethernet ( only a 1Gbs switch betweeen the 2 systems )
i have just assembled a new fileserver machine .
im using 4 x 2TB samsung drive in RAID 5.
the operating system is a minimal netinstall of debian 6.0 amd64 installed on a 4Gb usb drive .
the raid drives are a single partition in etx4 mounted under /home
im testing it using a 4,5 Gb file.
the client machine is a simple windows with RAID 0 drives on it .
as shown in the picture :
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
copying the FROM client TO server i obtain around 95% network usage .
if i copy intead FROM server TO client the network usage drop to 65% .
so there is bottleneck somewhere ?
or is it the normal behaviour ?
if it is normal , why it happen ?
my hardware setup should be enough to fulfill the bandwith right ?
why it doesnt happen copying the data back from the server to the client ?
thx in advance for help
NOTE :
-same situtaion happen also using the raid 5 cloud for both operating systema and area storage .
-the network link is 1Gbs ethernet ( only a 1Gbs switch betweeen the 2 systems )