I'd argue that "control" is the wrong way to think about it. If your neighbors are using 1, 6, 11 then it makes sense for you to do so as well. The laws of physics, and the radio regulations, don't care who owns which AP. If you have neighbors using channels 1 and 6, and you elect to use channel 3, you'll only be able to transmit when neither neighbor is transmitting. You'll have more chance of clear airtime if you overlap with just one neighbor (or set of neighbors) than two.The 1, 6, 11 spacing only really makes sense if you're controlling all the APs - and you're in the US.
Thank you, Colin. I read somewhere (lost track of where due to brain fade) that modern hardware was so good at evading that kind of interference that it didn't really matter anymore. And as I scan our neighborhood I see more and more mesh networks assigning channels anywhere in the 2.4GHz window.I don't think anything has changed regarding 802.11n. A "channel" still occupies ~20MHz and the channel spacing is only 5MHz, so it overlaps the two channels above and below the center channel. So the recommendation is as true (or not) as it's always been. The 1, 6, 11 spacing only really makes sense if you're controlling all the APs - and you're in the US. If you're in Europe you could use 1, 5, 9, 13 without any overlap.
And as I scan our neighborhood
Thread starter | Title | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
P | Does MLO negate DFS channel dropouts? | General Wi-Fi Discussion | 3 |
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!