kfmfe04
Occasional Visitor
FW: RT-N66U_3.0.0.4_354.29-BETA1.trx
I don't know if hostname resolution code has changed since 270, but it certainly looks like it's updating much faster for me now. In fact, this build is able to resolve all machine names on my network (including DHCPed ipads) except two units with static IPs (they show up as MAC addresses in the FW):
The interesting thing is, they are all specified on an internal DNS server (bind9) so if I do a nslookup (reverse) on any IPs, including the two above, the name lookup is correct.
In the firmware itself, I have specified my internal DNS server at:
because I have not yet found any other place to enter this info.
In the code, I see a call to the obsolete gethostbyaddr() in lookup_hostname() in netstat-nat.c, but I don't know if this is dead or live code.
What is the best way to coax the FW to recognise these machines by name?
--------------------------------------
NOTE: this is obviously very low priority since it has no effect on the functionality of the unit. I just posted this message in hopes that someone has come across a way to resolve this kind of issue before.
I don't know if hostname resolution code has changed since 270, but it certainly looks like it's updating much faster for me now. In fact, this build is able to resolve all machine names on my network (including DHCPed ipads) except two units with static IPs (they show up as MAC addresses in the FW):
- a Fuji Xerox network printer
- a Linux instance living inside virtualbox
The interesting thing is, they are all specified on an internal DNS server (bind9) so if I do a nslookup (reverse) on any IPs, including the two above, the name lookup is correct.
In the firmware itself, I have specified my internal DNS server at:
Advanced Settings/LAN/DHCP Server/DNS Server
because I have not yet found any other place to enter this info.
In the code, I see a call to the obsolete gethostbyaddr() in lookup_hostname() in netstat-nat.c, but I don't know if this is dead or live code.
What is the best way to coax the FW to recognise these machines by name?
--------------------------------------
NOTE: this is obviously very low priority since it has no effect on the functionality of the unit. I just posted this message in hopes that someone has come across a way to resolve this kind of issue before.
Last edited: