SomeWhereOverTheRainBow
Part of the Furniture
i believe the middle domain is for update failures with running update from the softwareWorking so far, thx... seems addresses 1 and 3 were getting blocked.
i believe the middle domain is for update failures with running update from the softwareWorking so far, thx... seems addresses 1 and 3 were getting blocked.
I highly recommend you looking at whitelisted domains from links for this github,Working so far, thx... seems addresses 1 and 3 were getting blocked.
i would recommend disabling diversion temporarily before turning on ivp6, then turn it back on. it will automatically configure to ipv6 support. @thelonelycoder is good like that with his predictive analysis of all possible outcomes. With unbound, you may have to edit your unbound.conf uncommenting the ipv6 stuff, or try running the update for the scripts. it may activate in this process. you may want to reconfigure you-tube ad-blocking todo both ipv4 and 6 because host files require both patterns when ipv6 is present.A couple questions for the crowd if I might
1. I currently am using Diversion w/pixelserv, FreshJR, and Unbound with ipv4 enabled on my router.
If I enable ipv6 do I need to reconfigure Diversion or pixelserv?
2. I’ve never bothered importing the pixelserv certificate into any of my devices. What am I missing out on by not doing that?
3. I have the “YouTube video ads blocking enabled” under blocking list options in Diversion. Is there any other steps I need to take to start seeing the benefit? I’ve had it on for days but nothing seems to be different.
Thank you!
No need to disable Diversion when enabling IPv6, it can and does handle that automatically.i would recommend disabling diversion temporarily before turning on ivp6, then turn it back on. it will automatically configure to ipv6 support. @thelonelycoder is good like that with his predictive analysis of all possible outcomes. With unbound, you may have to edit your unbound.conf uncommenting the ipv6 stuff, or try running the update for the scripts. it may activate in this process. you may want to reconfigure you-tube ad-blocking todo both ipv4 and 6 because host files require both patterns when ipv6 is present.
are you using the newest pihole 5.0? you can regex whitelist for all those whitelisted domains with subdomains you have a bunch of repeated domains for
unfortunately diversion does not support a wildcard whitelisting. at-least not that i know of.
Don't add a dot at the beginning of the domain name. The dot is implied by Dnsmasq.address=/.example.com/0.0.0.0
Diversion is not built for that scenario.@thelonelycoder : Could you help? Original question at https://www.snbforums.com/threads/diversion-the-router-ad-blocker.48538/page-322#post-585797
That's not how whitelisting works in Diversion.EDIT: dnsmasq should allow whitelisting with # i.e.
address=/.whitelisted.com/#
But yeah, looking for a response from TheLonelyCoder to glue this together "the diversion" way for alternate dns clients.
They have a couple of features in the works for pi hole 5.x that could be a game changer. For example they can already specify group of list that gets used per subnet on their client group management which allows (customizable guest network blocking 192.168.2.0/24, 192.168.3.0/24, etc.) This can be extended to offsite vpn subnets as well.. There is currently feature development for client group management per mac address and hostname in the works, but these devices must be within one hop.Yes, the current setup is PiHole 5.x based but it's a PITA with local lookups and guest wifi isolation. Diversion seems to use dnsmasq for blocking and I know dnsmasq allows wildcards in the dnsmasq.conf file like
address=/.blacklisted.com/0.0.0.0
This would blacklist *.blacklisted.com but you could be right, the whitelisting isn't clear, esp in a manner that keeps Diversion happy.
@thelonelycoder : Could you help? Original question at https://www.snbforums.com/threads/diversion-the-router-ad-blocker.48538/page-322#post-585797
EDIT: dnsmasq should allow whitelisting with # i.e.
address=/.whitelisted.com/#
But yeah, looking for a response from TheLonelyCoder to glue this together "the diversion" way for alternate dns clients.
Don't add a dot at the beginning of the domain name. The dot is implied by Dnsmasq.
Diversion is not built for that scenario.
I have a similar setup; DNSFilter a few MAC addresses to a Pi-hole that go upstream to a different DNS provider (cleanbrowsing family). If I take off the Pi-hole and just go upstream to cleanbrowsing family, then they lose ad-blocking. If I setup an Alternative Blocklist in Diversion, then I lose cleanbrowsing family's aggressive adult filtering.Thanks @thelonelycoder . Would you take up a feature request to support that scenario ?
Questions about the uiDivStats page should be asked here: https://www.snbforums.com/threads/uidivstats-webui-for-diversion-statistics.56393/Hello @thelonelycoder - i am a new user to ASUS routers and merlin flavor in general. Have 2 68U (used in AP mode only not AIMesh) and 1 AC88U (main)
My question is around webgui that I understand is coded by @Jack Yaz
I can see 10 blocked domains block and 10 requested domains block.
- Is it possible to increase more domains in either block?
- How do i go about checking blocked domains for a particular client?
Appreciate you help
Which NTP server(s) are you using? Diversion comes up later than the router's NTP sync attempts. The block or failure to resolve would therefore happen before Diversion comes into play.Need help when I have Diversion Standerd It stops NTP from working trying to find the problem but am having real trouble pinpointing it
That does not show any YouTube blocking stats yet.Everything is still working here, give the kid a laptop and watch YT and test it
View attachment 23597
Diversion is a software to blocks ads, with benefits for your router that are closely related to it.Thanks @thelonelycoder . Would you take up a feature request to support that scenario ?
Diversion is a software to blocks ads, with benefits for your router that are closely related to it.
Your idea, summarized as:
1. block any Internet access and
2. allow only limited domain resolution for a list of domains and
3. limit this to selected devices
This sounds like a job for a parental control software.
There are readily available options out there, one is already built into your router.
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!