Hi,
after I received my DS410 last week I did some performance tests. The files have been generated via console to represent the exact sizes. Here is the test environment.
Computer:
Router:
NAS:
Einheit: MegaByte/s
The Upload (Writing) seems to be CPU limited so I can explain the 50MB/s writing limit for this freescale driven NAS. I can't fully grasp the massive performance hit for smaller sized files though in the regime of image and PDF-Files. What I'd really like to know is if the ATOM-based NASes do have a significant performance advantage when it comes to smaller files.
Browsing images on the NAS I only get roughly 25MB/s (read), I'm thinking about trading in my DS410 and get a DS1010+ instead.
All I can always find are maximum transfer rates for very large files (>1GB). I'd really appreciate if someone could repeat a test like I did with an ATOM-based RAID 5 or if one could point me to a review/test that did something like it.
If a DS1010+ would give me a distinct performance advantage in this area, I'd really consider trading my DS410 in for one, which I still can do for another week.
Any advice appreciated
Randfee
after I received my DS410 last week I did some performance tests. The files have been generated via console to represent the exact sizes. Here is the test environment.
Computer:
- Intel C2D E8400 @*4,3 GHz
- 4GB DDR2 RAM
- HDD: WD20EARS
- Windows 7 Professional
Router:
- Netgear WNDR 3700 (Gbit Switch)
NAS:
- Synology DS410
- DSM 3.0-1337
- 4* Western Digital WD20EARS-00MVWB0 @ RAID5
- Samba-Share - Standard Settings

Einheit: MegaByte/s
The Upload (Writing) seems to be CPU limited so I can explain the 50MB/s writing limit for this freescale driven NAS. I can't fully grasp the massive performance hit for smaller sized files though in the regime of image and PDF-Files. What I'd really like to know is if the ATOM-based NASes do have a significant performance advantage when it comes to smaller files.
Browsing images on the NAS I only get roughly 25MB/s (read), I'm thinking about trading in my DS410 and get a DS1010+ instead.
All I can always find are maximum transfer rates for very large files (>1GB). I'd really appreciate if someone could repeat a test like I did with an ATOM-based RAID 5 or if one could point me to a review/test that did something like it.
If a DS1010+ would give me a distinct performance advantage in this area, I'd really consider trading my DS410 in for one, which I still can do for another week.
Any advice appreciated
Randfee
Last edited: