Diagram attached to help understand this long question.
I have had a network setup with a cable modem followed by a switch which has two routers connected using their WAN ports. When booted up in sequence the cable ISP would allow each router to obtain its own IP address, giving me separate IP's for each router and their LAN. This let me port forward on each router to achieve various functions on the two LAN's.
Now, the cable company will no longer give home accounts two IP's. Not even for $$.
To achieve the same function, can I replace the switch in the above description with a WAN Router and have it port forward a range of ports with no destination port set to the routers connected to its LAN jacks. For example, if an incoming packet has port 1001 set as it's destination, can I set the WAN Router to forward port range 1001:1999 to Router 1 with no destination port in the WAN Router forward instructions? And will the forwarded packet still have port 1001 as it's destination after the WAN Router forwards it so that Router 1 can forward port 1001 to PC1 on port 1001 (or another port if Router 1 translates it)?
This way myhouse.ddns.net:1001 as a address would reach PC1 with the correct translated port number. Say 3389 for Remote Desktop Connection usage. And myhouse.ddns.net:2003 would reach PC3 if the WAN Router forwarded port range 2001:2999 to Router 2.
And from an outgoing side, would double NAT be an issue? Router 1 NAT and then WAN Router also NAT?
Thanks for your comments and patience in reading this long post.
I have had a network setup with a cable modem followed by a switch which has two routers connected using their WAN ports. When booted up in sequence the cable ISP would allow each router to obtain its own IP address, giving me separate IP's for each router and their LAN. This let me port forward on each router to achieve various functions on the two LAN's.
Now, the cable company will no longer give home accounts two IP's. Not even for $$.
To achieve the same function, can I replace the switch in the above description with a WAN Router and have it port forward a range of ports with no destination port set to the routers connected to its LAN jacks. For example, if an incoming packet has port 1001 set as it's destination, can I set the WAN Router to forward port range 1001:1999 to Router 1 with no destination port in the WAN Router forward instructions? And will the forwarded packet still have port 1001 as it's destination after the WAN Router forwards it so that Router 1 can forward port 1001 to PC1 on port 1001 (or another port if Router 1 translates it)?
This way myhouse.ddns.net:1001 as a address would reach PC1 with the correct translated port number. Say 3389 for Remote Desktop Connection usage. And myhouse.ddns.net:2003 would reach PC3 if the WAN Router forwarded port range 2001:2999 to Router 2.
And from an outgoing side, would double NAT be an issue? Router 1 NAT and then WAN Router also NAT?
Thanks for your comments and patience in reading this long post.