Little question about fresh 3.0.0.4_376.49_alpha1

[Scaner]

Hello forum users,

Just compiled alpha firmware for my RT-AC56U and I have ve noticed that than I try to start any script from "/jffs/scripts" I see message like "sh: <script> not found" (although I can see it by cat) so need to input full path "/jffs/scripts/<script>" to start it. In previous build (376.48_1) I did not have to do this. It's not annoying just was curious.)

Thank you for your attention!

 

[RMerlin]

Hello forum users,

Just compiled alpha firmware for my RT-AC56U and I have ve noticed that than I try to start any script from "/jffs/scripts" I see message like "sh: <script> not found" (although I can see it by cat) so need to input full path "/jffs/scripts/<script>" to start it. In previous build (376.48_1) I did not have to do this. It's not annoying just was curious.)

Thank you for your attention!

This is normal behaviour for Linux, the current work directory is never part of the default search path, so you always need to specify the full path if a script or an executable is not part of the search path.

This was also the case with previous releases, and will also be the case for any standard Linux-based system.

 

[Scaner]

This is normal behaviour for Linux, the current work directory is never part of the default search path, so you always need to specify the full path if a script or an executable is not part of the search path.

This was also the case with previous releases, and will also be the case for any standard Linux-based system.

Thank you for reply! If it so I can not undestand why it worked earlier. I`ve just started script manually from this directory without full path (of coure i did not add this directory to default search path, strangely).