I need a NAS or ext HD for file backup. I'm currently backing up files from one PC to another PC over a network and would like to get away from that setup. Is the key difference b/t a NAS and an ext HD is the latter needs a PC (or a router) for file access? If my primary need is to backup files on a PC, it seems a NAS would be overkill. However, if I wanted some of the features of NAS (per SNB articles, like faster file sharing b/t PCs or media streaming to a PS3), it seems the NAS would be a better choice.
Am I on the right track here? If so, I have dumb question on NAS speed/performace. According to the charts, the Netgear ReadyNas's are in the 70s for avg read performace and the inexpensive dlink 321 is near the bottom of the chart at 11.3. This is a big range. How does the large difference in read performace impact my need for file backups and streaming HD video and pics to my PS3 (network is 10/100/1000 all around)?
In a nut shell, what does the extra performance (and cost!) get me?
many thanks!
Am I on the right track here? If so, I have dumb question on NAS speed/performace. According to the charts, the Netgear ReadyNas's are in the 70s for avg read performace and the inexpensive dlink 321 is near the bottom of the chart at 11.3. This is a big range. How does the large difference in read performace impact my need for file backups and streaming HD video and pics to my PS3 (network is 10/100/1000 all around)?
In a nut shell, what does the extra performance (and cost!) get me?
many thanks!