I am confused. When I read the reviews on the WNDR3700 on SNB, that router sounds like the best thing since sliced bread and, according to the competitive performance charts the router appears to out perform the 825 by a huge margin.
However, when I look at other sites reviews of the router, e.g. CNET here, the 825 fares much better in comparison and actually looks a bit better.
Why such a huge difference in testing outcomes for these 2 routers?
I also see a lot of people complaining about the 5GHZ signal for the WNDR3700 saying it is weak and has a very short range. Is that what folks here are seeing?
However, when I look at other sites reviews of the router, e.g. CNET here, the 825 fares much better in comparison and actually looks a bit better.
Why such a huge difference in testing outcomes for these 2 routers?
I also see a lot of people complaining about the 5GHZ signal for the WNDR3700 saying it is weak and has a very short range. Is that what folks here are seeing?
Last edited: