Dennis Wood
Senior Member
Tim, our tests here are more or less in line with what you've found..except we have the Netgear READYNAS PRO fully populated with six drives using their X-RAID and the QNAP TS509 with five drives in RAID 5. Our 639 is no longer connected due to it's less than stellar write performance. Both Netgear and TS509 we're testing are on the same network with LACP setup (two ports each) and the test workstations are now all running 64bit Vista SP1 with 8GB RAM with 4 drive RAID 0 onboard. One of the workstations is also using a 4 core processor now. Both NAS units have been upgraded to 4GB of RAM each. Both are connected to an HP Procurve 24port switch supporting LACP.
Overall the TS509 settles in at about 55MB/s write and 80MB/s read on very large files (over 20GB)
The Netgear READYNAS PRO is much faster on the same +20GB files, settling in at about 93 MB/s write and 103 MB/s read.
Btw, for any considering 64bit Vista SP1...it's been overall much better to deal with than the 32 bit version in terms of both performance and stability. It makes about zero difference though in network throughput...although we test with relatively idle workloads. I suspect that the 64 bit OS would fare much better on the network with multiple demanding processes in the background...being that most programs are still 32bit.
Overall the TS509 settles in at about 55MB/s write and 80MB/s read on very large files (over 20GB)
The Netgear READYNAS PRO is much faster on the same +20GB files, settling in at about 93 MB/s write and 103 MB/s read.
Btw, for any considering 64bit Vista SP1...it's been overall much better to deal with than the 32 bit version in terms of both performance and stability. It makes about zero difference though in network throughput...although we test with relatively idle workloads. I suspect that the 64 bit OS would fare much better on the network with multiple demanding processes in the background...being that most programs are still 32bit.
Last edited: