I currently run a Sky FTTC network using the Sky Hub as a modem with the AC68U as router. The ASUS runs Merlin, and I have had this setup for a few years without any problems. I'm aware that this setup isn't recommended because the Sky Hub doesn't have a modem only or bridge mode, but I have DNS and wifi turned off on the Hub and the AC68U sits in a DMZ. This seemed to work fine for years and it hasn't really caused me any issues, so I never saw the need to get a separate VDSL modem like the Vigor 130.
I started to have network issues a few weeks ago, with constant disconnections, and thought it was the Sky hub causing the problem - I kept having to reboot the Sky Hub and the AC68U to get things back up and running. I just so happened to have an updated Sky Hub (the Sky Q hub) so I replaced the existing SR102 with that, but the issues remain and I have pretty much narrowed it down to the problem being with the AC68U, rather than the Sky hub.
So, I have committed to replacing the AC68U. I'd prefer to replace everything with an integrated VDSL modem router, and dispense with the 2 box solution. Partly that's down to space and aesthetics, but also I want to reduce any risk of potential bottlenecks with chained devices. However, I'm open to recommendations on the best solution, and if 2 boxes is the way to go then so be it..
I have the following requirements:
Can anyone recommend a solution for me? Thanks in advance
I started to have network issues a few weeks ago, with constant disconnections, and thought it was the Sky hub causing the problem - I kept having to reboot the Sky Hub and the AC68U to get things back up and running. I just so happened to have an updated Sky Hub (the Sky Q hub) so I replaced the existing SR102 with that, but the issues remain and I have pretty much narrowed it down to the problem being with the AC68U, rather than the Sky hub.
So, I have committed to replacing the AC68U. I'd prefer to replace everything with an integrated VDSL modem router, and dispense with the 2 box solution. Partly that's down to space and aesthetics, but also I want to reduce any risk of potential bottlenecks with chained devices. However, I'm open to recommendations on the best solution, and if 2 boxes is the way to go then so be it..
I have the following requirements:
- If it's a single box solution, it needs to be compatible with Sky, that's a given - so as I understand it that means MER and Option 61 support
- Needs to be possible to install VPN on the router - I've been really happy with Merlin's FW for that, it's been a breeze to maintain the VPN, but I don't have any experience with other setups, so I'm not wedded to that as the only option. I use PIA but I'm guessing any router that allows OpenVPN or Wireguard setup is fine
- On the back of that, Wireguard compatibility would be nice but not essential
- Needs to support 20+ wireless devices
- I'd like to future proof as much as possible, so if 2 boxes are better than 1 in that regard then this would be the priority - I am with Sky through inertia partly - they provide as fast fibre as any other company in this area (currently c35Mbps) - but if better fibre becomes available then I will shift. I've been happy with Sky though so I'm not going to move without good reason. If 2 boxes are still the way to go I am going to replace the Sky hub with a VDSL modem though at this time.
- I have around 15 wired devices, currently connected using Powerline adapters via switches. I may consider cabling in the future but I'm fortunate that Powerline works really well in my house maxing out my network throughout, so at the moment I have no reason to make the switch. Having a decent number of ports is not essential, therefore, but would be future-proofed.
- I have a budget of up to around £250 for whatever solution is recommended.
Can anyone recommend a solution for me? Thanks in advance