I guess this is more a curiosity than a serious problem.
I have an RT-AC86U for my home and office. I've spent the last few weeks struggling with getting rMerlin 384.14_2 on it -- I had random reboots and some other weird behavior with the new code. I switched back to 384.13 a couple of times before I broke down and did a factory reset and manual reconfiguration, which seems to have solved the problem.
In the process I have been monitoring the router's uptime on the GUI Tools page, over hours and even multiple days, to watch for spurious reboots. Now that I don't have reboots I'm surprised to see that the uptime display, left to just click away, runs at a fraction of real time. I had a four hour period this morning when the uptime display advanced by less than two hours (which looks rather as though there was a spurious reboot!). But a reload on the browser brings it up to an accurate count. I've seen this on both 384.13 and 384.14_2.
As I was writing this it occurred to me I should try a different browser. I've been using using Chrome browser on a Mac. Voila! -- no problem with Firefox. Something in the way Chrome is handling the uptime clock field isn't right. I'm going to stop using Chrome, at least for router management duty.
I have an RT-AC86U for my home and office. I've spent the last few weeks struggling with getting rMerlin 384.14_2 on it -- I had random reboots and some other weird behavior with the new code. I switched back to 384.13 a couple of times before I broke down and did a factory reset and manual reconfiguration, which seems to have solved the problem.
In the process I have been monitoring the router's uptime on the GUI Tools page, over hours and even multiple days, to watch for spurious reboots. Now that I don't have reboots I'm surprised to see that the uptime display, left to just click away, runs at a fraction of real time. I had a four hour period this morning when the uptime display advanced by less than two hours (which looks rather as though there was a spurious reboot!). But a reload on the browser brings it up to an accurate count. I've seen this on both 384.13 and 384.14_2.
As I was writing this it occurred to me I should try a different browser. I've been using using Chrome browser on a Mac. Voila! -- no problem with Firefox. Something in the way Chrome is handling the uptime clock field isn't right. I'm going to stop using Chrome, at least for router management duty.