Currently have an RT-ac68u connected to my modem. However both are in a cabinet at distant part of the house due to where the internet cable line comes in. In the central part of the house, I get good 2.4 signal but very poor 5 signal such that it is unusable. At the other part of the house, I don't get any 2.4 or 5 GHz signal. Fortunately at the central part of the house, I have an ethernet port. I added an old TP-link TL-WR1043ND via ethernet and get good 2.4 signal to other part of the house.
I have hoping to update my system, mainly to get 5 GHz signal throughout.
I am looking at the the RT-AC86U as I don't have any wifi-6 devices and due to the cost difference between the AC and AX routers.
I have read the normal practice is to have the more powerful device (ie. 86U) as the main router and the lesser device (ie. 68U) as the access point. This seems to be particularly relevant for AiMesh. However I was thinking of possible benefits of other options:
Option 1: leaving 68U as router with 86U as the access point
- the main issue is wifi network to the other end of the house, particularly for 5 GHz. Currently the 68U 5 GHz signal can't reach the central part of the house. My concern is that if I use it as the access point, it may not reach the other end of the house
- the 86U presumablely has better range, so by putting it in the centre, there is the potential it can reach the other end of the house
Option 2: Aimesh mode with 68U as router and 86U as access point
- same as option 1, but potential benefits of AiMesh over just access point
Option 3: Aimesh mode with 86U as router and 68U as access point
- not sure if this will fix the problem of lack of range of the 68U
Thanks
I have hoping to update my system, mainly to get 5 GHz signal throughout.
I am looking at the the RT-AC86U as I don't have any wifi-6 devices and due to the cost difference between the AC and AX routers.
I have read the normal practice is to have the more powerful device (ie. 86U) as the main router and the lesser device (ie. 68U) as the access point. This seems to be particularly relevant for AiMesh. However I was thinking of possible benefits of other options:
Option 1: leaving 68U as router with 86U as the access point
- the main issue is wifi network to the other end of the house, particularly for 5 GHz. Currently the 68U 5 GHz signal can't reach the central part of the house. My concern is that if I use it as the access point, it may not reach the other end of the house
- the 86U presumablely has better range, so by putting it in the centre, there is the potential it can reach the other end of the house
Option 2: Aimesh mode with 68U as router and 86U as access point
- same as option 1, but potential benefits of AiMesh over just access point
Option 3: Aimesh mode with 86U as router and 68U as access point
- not sure if this will fix the problem of lack of range of the 68U
Thanks