aex.perez
Senior Member
Curious on the "BanAiProtect" feature. I had NOT withdrawn from the TrendMicro privacy agreement but I did have the AIProtect features disabled:
I ask because in testing bandwidth at the router with spdMerlin, whenever I enable a AIProtect feature I see a bandwidth drop. When I disable the feature, my bandwdith returns. I saw the bandwith drop all of a sudden, and saw all TrendMicro related feature were still off. But in this case I had to acturally withdraw from the privacy agreement to get my performance back even though the AIProtect features were still disabled in the router. As soon as I withdrew my consent my performance returned. Unfortunately I only pulled the system log, I did not get the timestamp of the ban to correlate with the time of the bandwidth drop. I didn't get before and after running processes out of scMerlin either. I did have "Import AiProtect Data" enabled in and was filtering all traffic.
Just for clarity, bandwith results on AX88U / 1Gb Fiber - results with 384.19 or 386.1 B4b - observation occurred with 386.1 B4b
~930D/~930U without Skynet
~920D/~910U with Skynet (outbound only)
~910D/~600U with Skynet (all)
~400D/~500U (no not reversed) Skynet (all) and TrendMicro feature (one or several) enabled
Attached, what it looked like when it happened, returned to normal when withdrawn from Privacy agreement...
Trying to methodically recreate what I saw happen but I figured I'd ask the question. If the "BanAiProtect" might've of triggered the use of AiProtect features even though I had them off at the Router but had not withdrawn from the privacy agreement?
- Malicious Sites Blocking
- Vulnerability Protection
- Infected Device Prevention and Blocking
I ask because in testing bandwidth at the router with spdMerlin, whenever I enable a AIProtect feature I see a bandwidth drop. When I disable the feature, my bandwdith returns. I saw the bandwith drop all of a sudden, and saw all TrendMicro related feature were still off. But in this case I had to acturally withdraw from the privacy agreement to get my performance back even though the AIProtect features were still disabled in the router. As soon as I withdrew my consent my performance returned. Unfortunately I only pulled the system log, I did not get the timestamp of the ban to correlate with the time of the bandwidth drop. I didn't get before and after running processes out of scMerlin either. I did have "Import AiProtect Data" enabled in and was filtering all traffic.
Just for clarity, bandwith results on AX88U / 1Gb Fiber - results with 384.19 or 386.1 B4b - observation occurred with 386.1 B4b
~930D/~930U without Skynet
~920D/~910U with Skynet (outbound only)
~910D/~600U with Skynet (all)
~400D/~500U (no not reversed) Skynet (all) and TrendMicro feature (one or several) enabled
Attached, what it looked like when it happened, returned to normal when withdrawn from Privacy agreement...
Trying to methodically recreate what I saw happen but I figured I'd ask the question. If the "BanAiProtect" might've of triggered the use of AiProtect features even though I had them off at the Router but had not withdrawn from the privacy agreement?