Menu
What's new
By:
Filters Better Search

Suricata Suricata - IDS on AsusWRT Merlin

  • SNBForums Code of Conduct

    SNBForums is a community for everyone, no matter what their level of experience.

    Please be tolerant and patient of others, especially newcomers. We are all here to share and learn!

    The rules are simple: Be patient, be nice, be helpful or be gone!

Suricata dies on my AC86 after some seconds:

admin@RT-AC86U-CAF0:/tmp/mnt/sda/entware/var/log/suricata# cat suricata.log
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Notice> - This is Suricata version 4.1.7 RELEASE
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Info> - CPUs/cores online: 2
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Info> - Found an MTU of 1500 for 'eth0'
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Info> - Found an MTU of 1500 for 'eth0'
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Info> - fast output device (regular) initialized: fast.log
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Info> - stats output device (regular) initialized: stats.log
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Info> - 8 rule files processed. 746 rules successfully loaded, 0 rules failed
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Info> - Threshold config parsed: 0 rule(s) found
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Info> - 746 signatures processed. 115 are IP-only rules, 36 are inspecting packet payload, 584 inspect application layer, 0 are decoder event only
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Info> - Going to use 2 thread(s)
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Notice> - AFL mode starting
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Notice> - AFL mode starting
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Notice> - all 2 packet processing threads, 0 management threads initialized, engine started.
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Info> - All AFP capture threads are running.
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:19 - <Notice> - Signal Received. Stopping engine.
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: type 0 name W#01-eth0 tmm_flags 0F flags 703 stream_pq 0x3a04d3d8
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: -> slot 0x3a04d1d0 id 0 tm_id 18 name ReceiveAFP
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: -> slot 0x3a04d320 id 1 tm_id 19 name DecodeAFP <==== stream_pq
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: -> slot 0x3a04d470 id 2 tm_id 0 name FlowWorker
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: -> slot 0x3a04f460 id 3 tm_id 10 name RespondReject
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04f6e0: type 0 name W#02-eth0 tmm_flags 0F flags 703 stream_pq 0x3a051908
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04f6e0: -> slot 0x3a051700 id 0 tm_id 18 name ReceiveAFP
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04f6e0: -> slot 0x3a051850 id 1 tm_id 19 name DecodeAFP <==== stream_pq
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04f6e0: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 4 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04f6e0: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 4 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04f6e0: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 4 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04f6e0: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 4 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04f6e0: -> slot 0x3a0519a0 id 2 tm_id 0 name FlowWorker
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04f6e0: -> slot 0x3a009660 id 3 tm_id 10 name RespondReject
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - Thread 1, W#01-eth0 type 0, tv 0x3a04b020 in_use 1
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020 type 0 name W#01-eth0 tmm_flags 0F flags 703
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - Thread 2, W#02-eth0 type 0, tv 0x3a04f6e0 in_use 1
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04f6e0 type 0 name W#02-eth0 tmm_flags 0F flags 703
 
vdemarco said:
I think i have it correct, here are some pieces of the yaml file


# Holds variables that would be used by the engine.
vars:

# Holds the address group vars that would be passed in a Signature.
address-groups:
HOME_NET: "[10.0.0.0/16]"
EXTERNAL_NET: "any"
DNS_SERVERS: "[10.0.0.1]"
SMTP_SERVERS: "$HOME_NET"
HTTP_SERVERS: "$HOME_NET"
SQL_SERVERS: "$HOME_NET"
TELNET_SERVERS: "$HOME_NET"
DNP3_SERVER: "$HOME_NET"
DNP3_CLIENT: "$HOME_NET"
MODBUS_SERVER: "$HOME_NET"
MODBUS_CLIENT: "$HOME_NET"
ENIP_SERVER: "$HOME_NET"
ENIP_CLIENT: "$HOME_NET"
FTP_SERVERS: "$HOME_NET"
SSH_SERVERS: "[10.0.0.155]"

# Linux high speed capture support
af-packet:
- interface: eth0
defrag: yes
use-mmap: yes
Click to expand...

All seems to be working now.i can ssh in etc. Now i just need to see if its really doing anything at all.
 
Can Suricata handle requests made by browsers utilizing DoH?
 
vdemarco said:
All seems to be working now.i can ssh in etc. Now i just need to see if its really doing anything at all.
Click to expand...

Ahh.... good for you!!!

1. Understanding that I have NO experience with suricata, IIRC you couldn't ssh in after a port scan. You might now try first a scan, then see if you can still ssh in from the same address (The logic would be that a port scan precedes an attack and that subsequent connection attempts from that scanning address are malevolent and to be blocked - logic that may or may not make sense depending on if this is a private access point (e.g. vpn) or public (e.g. https).

If you want to allow port scans first, you can likely edit the rule and change the action from something like "drop" or "block" to "log" or "report" (or comment out the rule entirely).

2. If you're going to "see if its really doing anything at all", how about comparing it's response to an attack with the response of AiProtect to the same attack!?

Wish I had the time to jump into this - maybe next week! Good Luck!!
 
mike37 said:
Ahh.... good for you!!!

1. Understanding that I have NO experience with suricata, IIRC you couldn't ssh in after a port scan. You might now try first a scan, then see if you can still ssh in from the same address (The logic would be that a port scan precedes an attack and that subsequent connection attempts from that scanning address are malevolent and to be blocked - logic that may or may not make sense depending on if this is a private access point (e.g. vpn) or public (e.g. https).

If you want to allow port scans first, you can likely edit the rule and change the action from something like "drop" or "block" to "log" or "report" (or comment out the rule entirely).

2. If you're going to "see if its really doing anything at all", how about comparing it's response to an attack with the response of AiProtect to the same attack!?

Wish I had the time to jump into this - maybe next week! Good Luck!!
Click to expand...
I tired that. and it still worked. the scan always shows just the 1 port open which is exactly as expected.

I think i need to turn on all of the logging and watch it to see whats up. (not 100% sure what i need to change in the yaml file to do this)

I am expecting to see stuff in the /opt/var/log/suricata/fast.log but that one is empty
the /opt/var/log/suricata/suricata.log has stuff but its really only startup info.

like this

28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Notice> - This is Suricata version 4.1.7 RELEASE
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - CPUs/cores online: 4
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - Found an MTU of 1500 for 'eth0'
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - Found an MTU of 1500 for 'eth0'
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - fast output device (regular) initialized: fast.log
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - stats output device (regular) initialized: stats.log
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - storing files in /opt/var/log/suricata/files
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - 8 rule files processed. 746 rules successfully loaded, 0 rules failed
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - Threshold config parsed: 0 rule(s) found
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - 746 signatures processed. 115 are IP-only rules, 36 are inspecting packet payload, 584 inspect application layer, 0 are decoder event only
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - Going to use 4 thread(s)
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Notice> - AFL mode starting
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Notice> - AFL mode starting
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Notice> - AFL mode starting
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Notice> - AFL mode starting
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Notice> - all 4 packet processing threads, 0 management threads initialized, engine started.
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - All AFP capture threads are running.

which all seems correct.
 
Mutzli said:
Can Suricata handle requests made by browsers utilizing DoH?
Click to expand...

(I'm a newbie; Rgnldo needs to confirm this)

The answer is yes - you can confirm the content of dns records (e.g. looking for invalid fields; overflows; etc.)
https://suricata.readthedocs.io/en/suricata-5.0.2/rules/dns-keywords.html

Other rules can confirm current encryption standards, certs, etc.

If there is a wonderful new attack/zero-day, there'll likely be an "emerging threat" rule that'll look for it.
 
vdemarco said:
All seems to be working now.i can ssh in etc. Now i just need to see if its really doing anything at all.
Click to expand...
This page seems to describe a test:

https://suricata.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quickstart.html#installation

Apparently "the signature with ID 2100498 from the ET Open ruleset is written specific for such test cases" and you can trigger it by:

Code: 
curl http://testmyids.com/

PS: I find this an interesting topic, but due to the Corona crisis I work from home and should not experiment too much with my router...
 
Last edited:
vdemarco said:
I think i have it correct, here are some pieces of the yaml file


# Holds variables that would be used by the engine.
vars:

# Holds the address group vars that would be passed in a Signature.
address-groups:
HOME_NET: "[10.0.0.0/16]"
EXTERNAL_NET: "any"
DNS_SERVERS: "[10.0.0.1]"
SMTP_SERVERS: "$HOME_NET"
HTTP_SERVERS: "$HOME_NET"
SQL_SERVERS: "$HOME_NET"
TELNET_SERVERS: "$HOME_NET"
DNP3_SERVER: "$HOME_NET"
DNP3_CLIENT: "$HOME_NET"
MODBUS_SERVER: "$HOME_NET"
MODBUS_CLIENT: "$HOME_NET"
ENIP_SERVER: "$HOME_NET"
ENIP_CLIENT: "$HOME_NET"
FTP_SERVERS: "$HOME_NET"
SSH_SERVERS: "[10.0.0.155]"

# Linux high speed capture support
af-packet:
- interface: eth0
defrag: yes
use-mmap: yes
Click to expand...
Is correct
 
amigohd said:
Suricata dies on my AC86 after some seconds:

admin@RT-AC86U-CAF0:/tmp/mnt/sda/entware/var/log/suricata# cat suricata.log
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Notice> - This is Suricata version 4.1.7 RELEASE
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Info> - CPUs/cores online: 2
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Info> - Found an MTU of 1500 for 'eth0'
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Info> - Found an MTU of 1500 for 'eth0'
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Info> - fast output device (regular) initialized: fast.log
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Info> - stats output device (regular) initialized: stats.log
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Info> - 8 rule files processed. 746 rules successfully loaded, 0 rules failed
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Info> - Threshold config parsed: 0 rule(s) found
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Info> - 746 signatures processed. 115 are IP-only rules, 36 are inspecting packet payload, 584 inspect application layer, 0 are decoder event only
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Info> - Going to use 2 thread(s)
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Notice> - AFL mode starting
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Notice> - AFL mode starting
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Notice> - all 2 packet processing threads, 0 management threads initialized, engine started.
28/4/2020 -- 19:44:10 - <Info> - All AFP capture threads are running.
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:19 - <Notice> - Signal Received. Stopping engine.
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: type 0 name W#01-eth0 tmm_flags 0F flags 703 stream_pq 0x3a04d3d8
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: -> slot 0x3a04d1d0 id 0 tm_id 18 name ReceiveAFP
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: -> slot 0x3a04d320 id 1 tm_id 19 name DecodeAFP <==== stream_pq
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 9 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: -> slot 0x3a04d470 id 2 tm_id 0 name FlowWorker
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020: -> slot 0x3a04f460 id 3 tm_id 10 name RespondReject
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04f6e0: type 0 name W#02-eth0 tmm_flags 0F flags 703 stream_pq 0x3a051908
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04f6e0: -> slot 0x3a051700 id 0 tm_id 18 name ReceiveAFP
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04f6e0: -> slot 0x3a051850 id 1 tm_id 19 name DecodeAFP <==== stream_pq
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04f6e0: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 4 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04f6e0: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 4 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04f6e0: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 4 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04f6e0: ==> post_pq: slot id 1 slot tm_id 19 post_pq.len 4 packet src stream (flow timeout)
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04f6e0: -> slot 0x3a0519a0 id 2 tm_id 0 name FlowWorker
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04f6e0: -> slot 0x3a009660 id 3 tm_id 10 name RespondReject
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - Thread 1, W#01-eth0 type 0, tv 0x3a04b020 in_use 1
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04b020 type 0 name W#01-eth0 tmm_flags 0F flags 703
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - Thread 2, W#02-eth0 type 0, tv 0x3a04f6e0 in_use 1
28/4/2020 -- 19:45:20 - <Notice> - tv 0x3a04f6e0 type 0 name W#02-eth0 tmm_flags 0F flags 703
Click to expand...
Follow the installation correctly, as posted
 
vdemarco said:
I tired that. and it still worked. the scan always shows just the 1 port open which is exactly as expected.

I think i need to turn on all of the logging and watch it to see whats up. (not 100% sure what i need to change in the yaml file to do this)

I am expecting to see stuff in the /opt/var/log/suricata/fast.log but that one is empty
the /opt/var/log/suricata/suricata.log has stuff but its really only startup info.

like this

28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Notice> - This is Suricata version 4.1.7 RELEASE
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - CPUs/cores online: 4
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - Found an MTU of 1500 for 'eth0'
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - Found an MTU of 1500 for 'eth0'
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - fast output device (regular) initialized: fast.log
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - stats output device (regular) initialized: stats.log
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - storing files in /opt/var/log/suricata/files
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - 8 rule files processed. 746 rules successfully loaded, 0 rules failed
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - Threshold config parsed: 0 rule(s) found
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - 746 signatures processed. 115 are IP-only rules, 36 are inspecting packet payload, 584 inspect application layer, 0 are decoder event only
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - Going to use 4 thread(s)
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Notice> - AFL mode starting
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Notice> - AFL mode starting
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Notice> - AFL mode starting
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Notice> - AFL mode starting
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Notice> - all 4 packet processing threads, 0 management threads initialized, engine started.
28/4/2020 -- 08:04:56 - <Info> - All AFP capture threads are running.

which all seems correct.
Click to expand...
Is correct. You followed the installation guidance correctly.
 
mike37 said:
(I'm a newbie; Rgnldo needs to confirm this)
Click to expand...
I'm such a newbie. I'm learning from all of you.
mike37 said:
If there is a wonderful new attack/zero-day, there'll likely be an "emerging threat" rule that'll look for it.
Click to expand...
There are Suricata rules for DNS UDP and TCP.
 
Mutzli said:
Can Suricata handle requests made by browsers utilizing DoH?
Click to expand...
Suricata is not based on DNS traffic. It is by engine and signed rules.
 
Hi rgnldo

On starting suricata I do not have an /opt/var/log/suricata/suricata.log - I only have stats.log and fast.log -
is this normal - both of those files empty


Resolved - enabled log in suricata.yaml file -

Code: 
29/4/2020 -- 13:15:44 - <Notice> - This is Suricata version 4.1.7 RELEASE
29/4/2020 -- 13:15:44 - <Info> - CPUs/cores online: 2
29/4/2020 -- 13:15:44 - <Info> - Found an MTU of 1464 for 'ppp0'
29/4/2020 -- 13:15:44 - <Info> - Found an MTU of 1464 for 'ppp0'
29/4/2020 -- 13:15:45 - <Info> - fast output device (regular) initialized: fast.log
29/4/2020 -- 13:15:45 - <Info> - stats output device (regular) initialized: stats.log
29/4/2020 -- 13:15:45 - <Info> - 8 rule files processed. 746 rules successfully loaded, 0 rules failed
29/4/2020 -- 13:15:45 - <Info> - Threshold config parsed: 0 rule(s) found
29/4/2020 -- 13:15:45 - <Info> - 746 signatures processed. 115 are IP-only rules, 36 are inspecting packet payload, 584 inspect application layer, 0 are decoder event only
29/4/2020 -- 13:15:45 - <Info> - Going to use 1 thread(s)
29/4/2020 -- 13:15:45 - <Notice> - AFL mode starting
29/4/2020 -- 13:15:45 - <Notice> - all 1 packet processing threads, 0 management threads initialized, engine started.
29/4/2020 -- 13:15:45 - <Info> - All AFP capture threads are running.

BTW is it worth enabling the other rules in .yaml file?
Code: 
 # - ciarmy.rules
  # - teste.rules
  # - emerging-worm.rules
  # - tor.rules
  # - emerging-attack_response.rules
  # - emerging-shellcode.rules
  # - emerging-dns.rules
  # - emerging-dos.rules
  # - emerging-exploit.rules
  # - emerging-trojan.rules
  # - emerging-web_client.rules
  # - emerging-web_server.rules
 
Last edited:
Suricata can also be configured to block outgoing packets right? from simple reading i can set it up to block dns queries for facebook, etc.. Very interesting. I am assuming that all works with this version too?
 
vdemarco said:
Suricata can also be configured to block outgoing packets right? from simple reading i can set it up to block dns queries for facebook, etc.. Very interesting. I am assuming that all works with this version too?
Click to expand...
IDS/IPS.
Study the rules and the classification.config file
 
Well now this makes me want to get a newer router. This and the fact that Merlin said my 3200 is on "life support..."
 
After installing and configuring Suricata, my syslog is flooded with the following:
Code: 
Apr 29 00:16:32 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: device eth0 entered promiscuous mode
Apr 29 00:16:32 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
Apr 29 00:16:35 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
Apr 29 00:16:35 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
Apr 29 00:16:35 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
Apr 29 00:16:38 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
Apr 29 00:16:41 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
Apr 29 00:16:44 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
Apr 29 00:16:47 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
Apr 29 00:16:50 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
Apr 29 00:16:53 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
Apr 29 00:16:56 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
Apr 29 00:16:57 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
Apr 29 00:16:59 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
Apr 29 00:17:00 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
Apr 29 00:17:02 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
Apr 29 00:17:03 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
Apr 29 00:17:05 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
Apr 29 00:17:05 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
Apr 29 00:17:05 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
Apr 29 00:17:08 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
Apr 29 00:17:11 RT-AX88U-xxxx kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth0
...

ifconfig shows:
Code: 
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr {MAC-ADDRESS}
          inet addr:{WAN-IP}  Bcast:{WAN-BROADCAST} Mask:255.255.252.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING ALLMULTI MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:464713 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:229411 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:531012108 (506.4 MiB)  TX bytes:48786336 (46.5 MiB)

I configured /opt/etc/suricata/suricata.yaml as follows:
Code: 
  address-groups:
    HOME_NET: "[192.168.222.0/24]"
    EXTERNAL_NET: "any"
    DNS_SERVERS: "[192.168.222.1]"

af-packet:
 - interface: eth0

In addition to primary network (192.168.222.0/24), I have OpenVPN and two VLANs configured with their own subnets. Any thoughts on what might be causing the syslog errors and how to resolve?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

RMerlin
  • Locked
Beta Asuswrt-Merlin 3006.102.1 Beta is now available for WIfi 7 devices
3 4 5
Replies
97
Views
14K
RMerlin
RMerlin
HELLO_wORLD
One mirroring solution for IDS (my approach and solution)
Replies
5
Views
1K
HELLO_wORLD
HELLO_wORLD
garycnew
Entware [SOLUTION] Cross-Compile xxHash Entware Package via Debian Live DVD
Replies
0
Views
2K
garycnew
garycnew
garycnew
Entware [SOLUTION] Cross-Compile ProxyChains-NG Entware Package via Debian Live DVD
2
Replies
22
Views
3K
sfx2000
sfx2000
garycnew
Entware [SOLUTION] Cross-Compile Nyx (Tor Command-Line Monitor) Entware Package via Debian Live DVD
Replies
0
Views
2K
garycnew
garycnew
Similar threads
Thread starter Title Forum Replies Date
thelonelycoder amtm amtm 5.0 - the Asuswrt-Merlin Terminal Menu, November 17, 2024 Asuswrt-Merlin AddOns 61
J Entware Possible to install jdownloader on asuswrt-merlin router with entware?? Asuswrt-Merlin AddOns 9
W Skynet SOLVED: Scrollbar Disappears on Skynet Tab on Asuswrt-Merlin 386.14 Asuswrt-Merlin AddOns 10
thelonelycoder scMerlin scMerlin 2.5.8 - Service and script control menu for Asuswrt-Merlin, October 20, 2024 Asuswrt-Merlin AddOns 85
JGrana uKasa uKasa - A utility script that manages Kasa smart outlets and switches with Asuswrt-Merlin routers Asuswrt-Merlin AddOns 29
JGrana Updated Hue Utility - huetil Control and manage your Hue system from Asuswrt-Merlin or Raspbian Asuswrt-Merlin AddOns 1
8 ASUS RT-AX58U (F/W Ver.:V3.0.0.4.384.8601) with Asuswrt-Merlin 3004.388.5 - Transmission: "Could not connect to the server. You may need to reload" Asuswrt-Merlin AddOns 2

Similar threads

Latest threads

Support SNBForums w/ Amazon

If you'd like to support SNBForums, just use this link and buy anything on Amazon. Thanks!

Sign Up For SNBForums Daily Digest

Get an update of what's new every day delivered to your mailbox. Sign up here!

Members online

Total: 856 (members: 24, guests: 832)
Top