@bsdsource
@bsdsource
Did you load the module?
Code:admin@rtac66b1:/lib/modules/2.6.36.4brcmarm/kernel/net# modprobe xt_TPROXY admin@rtac66b1:/lib/modules/2.6.36.4brcmarm/kernel/net# lsmod | grep TPROXY xt_TPROXY 958 0 nf_tproxy_core 1262 1 xt_TPROXY,[permanent]
I just entered the codes above but only got the first lineDid you load the module?
Code:admin@rtac66b1:/lib/modules/2.6.36.4brcmarm/kernel/net# modprobe xt_TPROXY admin@rtac66b1:/lib/modules/2.6.36.4brcmarm/kernel/net# lsmod | grep TPROXY xt_TPROXY 958 0 nf_tproxy_core 1262 1 xt_TPROXY,[permanent]
Different kernel. This thread is discussing kernel 2.6.36, your router runs kernel 4.1. That module does not exist on your router.I just entered the codes above but only got the first line
xt_TPROXY xxx 0
How to fix it?thanks
PS: my router is AC-86U
Different kernel. This thread is discussing kernel 2.6.36, your router runs kernel 4.1. That module does not exist on your router.
xt_socket is not the same thing as nf_tproxy_core. The latter no longer even exists in the net/netfilter/ source code of 4.1.xx, there's nonly xt_TPROXY.@RMerlin
I thought I remember @Tech9 validating that these modules were still included and loaded with kernel-4.1 in the following thread:
https://www.snbforums.com/threads/a...t-time-machine-ipsec.76992/page-2#post-740571
Respectfully,
Gary
xt_socket is not the same thing as nf_tproxy_core. The latter no longer even exists in the net/netfilter/ source code of 4.1.xx, there's nonly xt_TPROXY.
@Tech9
Did I misunderstand your response in the previously referenced post suggesting you were able to modprobe xt_socket and xt_tproxy on a kernel-4.1 device?
Respectfully,
Gary
admin@RT-AX86U:/# uname -r
4.1.52
admin@RT-AX86U:/# modprobe xt_socket
admin@RT-AX86U:/# modprobe xt_TPROXY
admin@RT-AX86U:/# lsmod | grep xt_
xt_TPROXY 5057 0
xt_socket 3926 0
Did I misunderstand your response
Code:admin@RT-AX86U:/# uname -r 4.1.52 admin@RT-AX86U:/# modprobe xt_socket admin@RT-AX86U:/# modprobe xt_TPROXY admin@RT-AX86U:/# lsmod | grep xt_ xt_TPROXY 5057 0 xt_socket 3926 0
I'm confused by why you're confused. RMerlin's reply was in response to post #7. In that post @bhaji said his output was different from RMerlin's output. He didn't have the@RMerlin - Have I misunderstood your point?
nf_tproxy_core 1262 1 xt_TPROXY,[permanent]
line. RMerlin explained why the nf_tproxy_core
line was missing.I'm confused by why you're confused. RMerlin's reply was in response to post #7. In that post @bhaji said his output was different from RMerlin's output. He didn't have thenf_tproxy_core 1262 1 xt_TPROXY,[permanent]
line. RMerlin explained why thenf_tproxy_core
line was missing.
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!