What's new

Will my current AC56U be able to support?

  • SNBForums Code of Conduct

    SNBForums is a community for everyone, no matter what their level of experience.

    Please be tolerant and patient of others, especially newcomers. We are all here to share and learn!

    The rules are simple: Be patient, be nice, be helpful or be gone!

OKLY

Occasional Visitor
Hi all,

Currently I am using an AC56U clocked at 1000,666.

My current Internet speed is 100/50 mbps. At the moment my router has no issues and is more than capable enough, even when it serves as an OpenVPN server I can still get 50mbps at client's side.

Starting next month, there will be a free upgrade given by my ISP and I'll be getting 800/200 mbps.

Question is, will my current router still be capable enough to handle it?
 
BogoMIPS figure as below.

Processor : ARMv7 Processor rev 0 (v7l)
processor : 0
BogoMIPS : 1998.84

processor : 1
BogoMIPS : 1998.84
 
Question is, will my current router still be capable enough to handle it?

waubcyB.jpg


FWIW: You should be able to come very close to hitting your 800Mbps max download throughput w/this router according to Tim's review...
 
waubcyB.jpg


FWIW: You should be able to come very close to hitting your 800Mbps max download throughput w/this router according to Tim's review...
The test would have probably been done in stock processor clock speed and since it can manage to get near 800mbps of WAN-LAN throughput, I believe mine will be slightly more comfortable since it is running at slightly higher processor clock speed.

Either way, would the processor be under high load when there is 800mbps of data going through the router in this case?
 
Either way, would the processor be under high load when there is 800mbps of data going through the router in this case?
The CPU and switch chip of the RT-AC56U is the same as the RT-AC68U so the performance should be the same as seen in Tim's review of the RT-AC68U. So provided you're using hardware acceleration the throughput should be as shown. CPU load should be fairly low because hardware acceleration largely bypasses it. Of course if you use features that disable hardware then you will be CPU-limited to about 300Mbps.
 
The CPU and switch chip of the RT-AC56U is the same as the RT-AC68U so the performance should be the same as seen in Tim's review of the RT-AC68U. So provided you're using hardware acceleration the throughput should be as shown. CPU load should be fairly low because hardware acceleration largely bypasses it. Of course if you use features that disable hardware then you will be CPU-limited to about 300Mbps.
Only CTF will be good enough right?
 
Only CTF will be good enough right?
I think you'll just have to wait and see, everybody's use case if different. One thing's for sure, your line upgrade won't make your existing router slower.:)

By way of comparison, here are my CPU loads when pulling my maximum line speed of 380Mbps (no QoS or anything else enabled).

No H/W acceleration: 65%
CTF only : 35%
CTF+FA : 1%

Note that with H/W acceleration disabled and QoS enabled the most I can get is 260Mbps (but that's highly dependent on the number of rules). In this situation the throughput is CPU limited because QoS is single threaded and one of the CPUs is at 100% while the other is mostly idle.

This was with my RT-AC68U overclocked to 1.2GHz/800MHz.
 
By way of comparison, here are my CPU loads when pulling my maximum line speed of 380Mbps (no QoS or anything else enabled).

No H/W acceleration: 65%
CTF only : 35%
CTF+FA : 1%
I have also been reading that with FA on top of CTF, the CPU load goes down tremendously. However I've came across some comments that mentioned if I'm using PPPoE and VLAN that it is advisable not to turn off Spanning-Tree Protocol (which in this case FA will never be enabled).
 

Latest threads

Support SNBForums w/ Amazon

If you'd like to support SNBForums, just use this link and buy anything on Amazon. Thanks!

Sign Up For SNBForums Daily Digest

Get an update of what's new every day delivered to your mailbox. Sign up here!
Top