Search results

  • SNBForums Code of Conduct

    SNBForums is a community for everyone, no matter what their level of experience.

    Please be tolerant and patient of others, especially newcomers. We are all here to share and learn!

    The rules are simple: Be patient, be nice, be helpful or be gone!

  1. A

    PCE-AC68 Windows 10 Drivers

    Yes, Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
  2. A

    PCE-AC68 Windows 10 Drivers

    I don't have this problem at all. I get 1 ms pings consistently to my RT-AC3200 with the 6.30.223.228 driver. I'm also testing on a floor above where the router is, and beamforming is enabled.
  3. A

    USB AC-53 with RT-AC3200 not getting proper download speeds

    It's a Zbox ID82 mini. And I'm also having similar issues with a USB-AC56R on it. With a PCE-AC68 on a different computer in the same house, situated further away from the router, I'm not having problems.
  4. A

    PCE-AC68 Windows 10 Drivers

    ASUS PCE-AC68 Utility 2.1.0.8 is out https://www.asus.com/us/Networking/PCEAC68/HelpDesk_Download/ Oddly, the beamforming option was removed in 2.1.0.8 FWIW, with the new driver, the Utility kept initializing in a constant loop for me over and over. Also, with an RT-AC3200, I kept connecting...
  5. A

    PCE-AC68 Windows 10 Drivers

    Okay, thanks, so you're using Asus Windows 8 drivers?
  6. A

    PCE-AC68 Windows 10 Drivers

    I was thinking of getting the PCE-AC68 for a desktop running Windows 10, but this thread is starting to scare me. What would you folks recommend getting instead to use with an RT-AC3200 router and Windows 10?
  7. A

    Adaptive QoS icons missing in RT-AC3200

    I reloaded an older config. I noticed as soon as I change the upload bandwidth and download bandwidth and click "apply", the selections go missing. So, I then reloaded the same older config, disabled adaptive QoS, turned the QoS slider button on again, made my speed changes, and then clicked...
  8. A

    Adaptive QoS icons missing in RT-AC3200

    Any thoughts on how to go about fixing this? I tried reflashing 3.0.0.4.378_7838, but that didn't help.
  9. A

    USB AC-53 with RT-AC3200 not getting proper download speeds

    Sure, but I was under the impression USB 2.0 is 480 Mbps, still far greater than 300 Mbps. So, you're saying 150Mbps from 480 should be considered normal? But that doesn't explain why changing settings saw a jump from 150 to 225. I get the same result from across multiple speed test sites...
  10. A

    USB AC-53 with RT-AC3200 not getting proper download speeds

    You don't see the problem in having a link rate of 866.7 Mbps--and being limited to 150 Mbps from it? By the way, I enabled "optimize AMPDU aggregation" under the "Professional tab." Doing so briefly brought me to 225 Mbps for about 5 speed tests in a row. I then started fiddling around with...
  11. A

    USB AC-53 with RT-AC3200 not getting proper download speeds

    Hi, I'm using Windows 10 Pro 64 bit edition with a USB AC-53 adapter (I own two of these) along with a RT-AC3200 firmware version 3.0.0.4.378_7838 When I use a networking cable from my modem, speedtests indicate over 300 Mbps (down). When I connect using networking cables from the modem to my...
  12. A

    Asus firmware draining phones battery

    I'm seeing this problem with an Iphone 5S and an RT-AC3200 with firmware 3.0.0.4.378_7838 Is there a setting in the router I can change to address this problem?
  13. A

    3.0.0.4.374.130

    Please check your signal strength now (dbm). The next time 5ghz data rate/link rate hits 175.5, please check your signal strength again.
  14. A

    5ghz Signal Dies

    This issue still persists on two different RT-AC66U units that I've tried.
  15. A

    3.0.0.4.374.130

    I'm seeing something similar.
  16. A

    3.0.0.4.374.130

    When your 5Ghz link rate drops to 175.5, does your signal strength also drop? Mine does. And I'm now seeing this on two different RT-AC66Us at factory defaults using 3.0.0.4.374.130 When your link speed returns to max does the signal strength increase as well?
  17. A

    3.0.0.4.374.130

    Edit: I mistakenly thought FLA NL was using PCE-AC66, but I should have realized otherwise when 866.5 max link rate was mentioned (should be higher with a PCE-AC66). Or maybe I was reading a PCE-AC66 thread and confused FLA NL with someone else. PCI-E is, of course, faster, and with a PCE-AC66...
  18. A

    3.0.0.4.374.130

    Yeah, I'm well aware of that. Anyway, I'm still waiting for my link rate to drop so I can test again.
  19. A

    3.0.0.4.374.130

    Alright, thanks. I'll test again after the link rate drops.
Top