Any 4x4:4 will be better.
RT-AX88U Pro, for example.
Sorry I didn't get you.Probably not. It just has 3x3:3 antennae for the 2.4GHz Band.
RT-AX88U Pro.
TUF Gaming AX4200 - Tech Specs|WiFi Routers|ASUS Global
Detailed specification of TUF Gaming AX4200 Tech Specsï¼Network Standard :IEEE 802.11a|IEEE 802.11b|IEEE 802.11g|WiFi 4 (802.11n)|WiFi 5 (802.11ac)|WiFi 6 (802.11ax)|IPv4|IPv6ãNetwork Standard :IEEE 802.11a|IEEE 802.11b|IEEE 802.11g|WiFi 4 (802.11n)|WiFi 5 (802.11ac)|WiFi 6...www.asus.com
I guessed wrong.
The AX4200 you have only has 3x3:3 for 5GHz. For 2.4GHz, it is worse: 2x2:2.
The number of antennae is the NxN, and the :N is the number of streams (no, they don't always match). They all matter.
Yes, overall a much better, better balanced, and superior purchase.
As for the absolute range, your environment will still determine that in the end.
Great, thanks!All WiFi routers still being sold today are (almost) backward compatible with the original iteration first released in 1971. That is what WiFi is based on, after all. Compatibility.
That screenshot doesn't show anything relevant to being compatible, btw.
The TUF series is not a good choice. Particularly when the RT-AX88U Pro is already a proven model.
6 antennae? Is there any wire inside two of them? Or, does the TUF model use two for dedicated 2.4GHz (or 5GHz), while the other four are shared?
If it had 8 (or 12) antennae, it could make real use of them. I don't know what benefits 6 antennae may offer to a 4x4:4 router on each of its bands, if there really are 6 antennae, of course.
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!