I have given up for now at using the AC68U with storage drives. I moved my drives to a mini-ITX based PC I use for my TV.
From RMerlin: "Using a native filesystem is always better."
Apple, my new observation of the last couple of weeks is to now prefer EXT4 format (example Linux format) drives, rather than NTFS, for the Merlin Linux routers. For example have solved a heavy usage occasional-corruption problem with one client by switching their main storage device from NTFS to EXT4. My earlier preference for NTFS was based only on the fact that peak read speeds are SLIGHTLY higher (i.e. NTFS reads are not real-world-noticeably higher) with Merlin routers. Was way over-thinking that "detectable" advantage of NTFS.
Am now feeling that my endorsement of NTFS was foolish, it's better for the Merlin Linux routers to use somewhat more fault tolerant, pounded-the-farthest-way-into-the-Linux-distros-for-years formats like EXT4 rather than NTFS. You MIGHT want to use the free Minitool Partition Wizard on one of your Windows machines to format yourself an EXT4 drive and give it one more chance in your Merlin router.
At one time thought it would be irritating to not be able to plug an EXT4 storage device into some nearby Windows machine for troubleshooting/repairing the file system. But have finally wised up and realized that as a "best practice" we should not depend on troubleshooting a defective device to keep us out of trouble. Clients should have enough backups that there is no tragedy in just (presumably extremely occasionally) reformatting a "defective" storage device and restoring its contents from the latest snapshot. If that's not a good enough plan, then just install
http://www.ext2fsd.com/
on any Windows machine you want to use to look at an EXT4 format drive. If that's not good enough, just boot Ubuntu Linux from a spare flash drive:
http://www.ubuntu.com/download/desktop/create-a-usb-stick-on-windows
Anyway have switched all my important Merlin storage users to EXT4.
Agreed that it is silly to expect anything but the most basic utility from a WiFi router as a storage manager, considering that far more capable NAS devices are buyable in the $60-$150 range (used/new). The only reason that am using storage devices off of my Merlin routers is to save a few watts of electricity for clients that only have the simplest demands on their network storage.
To repeatedly pound on that point, the only good reason can think of to REGULARLY use Merlin 10-watt routers as NAS devices is an ecological one, to save energy. That's a good reason, but it's about the only one unless someone else can think of any. If you're not in it for the energy savings, and you're using the storage daily and continuously, and you could afford one of these high-end routers (compared to all the $15-$40 dollar ones out there), how is it not worth it to you to buy a dirt cheap/used NAS box that has much more storage utility?