I have TMHI, initially I was using their Gateway (Sagemcom) and I think it is configured with IPv6 Passthrough, I have my own Asus Router (AX88U) connected to the TMHI Gateway, I have IPv6 in the Asus configured as Passthrough as well, and every time the Sagemcom reboots (planned or unplanned) my clients (on the Asus Router side) start having issues with IPv6, I think it might be related to that TMHI only provides 1 IPv6 address/DHCPv6 PD?
If I check the clients having issues, I noticed the number of IPv6 addresses assigned start to increase, I have to disconnect them from the network, so they will refresh their IPs (4 and 6) and all is good again, for a while, until the next restart on the TMHI gateway, sometimes is not even a restart, maybe TMHI CGNAT/DHCPv6 server will assign a new IPv6 and the problem starts again. Is this an issue with the Asus Router and IPv6 Passthrough? I don't think so, but checking in.
I have now, a third part gateway, to replace the TMHI provided gateway (Sagemcom), it has the capability to be configured with Passthrough and NAT6, initial tests in Passthrough mode, provided the same results/issues as with the Sagemcom, do you think changing the third party gateway IPv6 configuration to NAT6 might help solve the issues?
If I check the clients having issues, I noticed the number of IPv6 addresses assigned start to increase, I have to disconnect them from the network, so they will refresh their IPs (4 and 6) and all is good again, for a while, until the next restart on the TMHI gateway, sometimes is not even a restart, maybe TMHI CGNAT/DHCPv6 server will assign a new IPv6 and the problem starts again. Is this an issue with the Asus Router and IPv6 Passthrough? I don't think so, but checking in.
I have now, a third part gateway, to replace the TMHI provided gateway (Sagemcom), it has the capability to be configured with Passthrough and NAT6, initial tests in Passthrough mode, provided the same results/issues as with the Sagemcom, do you think changing the third party gateway IPv6 configuration to NAT6 might help solve the issues?