Jaime Alvarez
Regular Contributor
After I encountered a couple of places that blocked my "normal" UDP vpn, I configured a second openvpn server using TCP and port 443. This second config works fine, although it is a bit slower. A simple speedtest.net comparison yields 180Mbps for downloads / 9 ms ping time for the UDP server, and 150 Mbps /50 ms for the TCP server connection.
Here's my concern. Are there any drawbacks from having both openvpn servers running? I like to connect to the UDP server by default, to take advantage of the slightly better bandwidth, and only switch to the TCP server when I can't get through, but don't really see any relevant difference. Plus I use mainly for securing my connection when using public WiFi hotspots. I don't know how to evaluate the processing overhead and whether it may become relevant in certain scenarios, but it seems sensible to leave only the TCP server.
Any thoughts?
Here's my concern. Are there any drawbacks from having both openvpn servers running? I like to connect to the UDP server by default, to take advantage of the slightly better bandwidth, and only switch to the TCP server when I can't get through, but don't really see any relevant difference. Plus I use mainly for securing my connection when using public WiFi hotspots. I don't know how to evaluate the processing overhead and whether it may become relevant in certain scenarios, but it seems sensible to leave only the TCP server.
Any thoughts?