What's new

ASUS GT-AX11000 Pro vs ASUS GT-AXE11000

  • SNBForums Code of Conduct

    SNBForums is a community for everyone, no matter what their level of experience.

    Please be tolerant and patient of others, especially newcomers. We are all here to share and learn!

    The rules are simple: Be patient, be nice, be helpful or be gone!

No1Viking

Occasional Visitor
Hi guys,

I want to buy a new router and retire my RT-AX88U (not pro).
Currently I am looking at ASUS GT-AX11000 Pro and ASUS GT-AXE11000.

I've been looking at them for several days not and I cannot decide which one to buy.
Please advice.

Of course, if you have something else to recommend, you are more than welcome.

Michael
 
I asked Chat GPT to compare the two routers.

When comparing the ASUS GT-AX11000 Pro and ASUS GT-AXE11000, several factors should be considered depending on your specific needs, such as performance, future-proofing, Wi-Fi standards, and value for money. Here’s an overview of the differences from various perspectives:


1. Wi-Fi Standard
ASUS GT-AX11000 Pro: This is a Wi-Fi 6 router (802.11ax), meaning it supports speeds up to 10 Gbps and offers improved capacity and performance compared to Wi-Fi 5.
ASUS GT-AXE11000: This is a Wi-Fi 6E router, an upgraded version of Wi-Fi 6. The main difference is the addition of a new 6 GHz frequency band, offering significantly less interference and higher speeds in crowded environments with many devices.

Winner: ASUS GT-AXE11000 due to its more future-proof Wi-Fi 6E technology, which provides better performance on the 6 GHz band.


2. Speed and Performance
ASUS GT-AX11000 Pro: It delivers up to 11,000 Mbps total wireless speed across three bands (2.4 GHz, 5 GHz x2).
ASUS GT-AXE11000: It also offers up to 11,000 Mbps in total, but with the addition of the 6 GHz band, which can result in even faster speeds and lower latency if you have compatible devices that can use this band.

Winner: ASUS GT-AXE11000, since the 6 GHz band improves performance in high-bandwidth environments.

3. Future-proofing
Wi-Fi 6 is still highly capable and will remain relevant for several years, but Wi-Fi 6E will likely be more future-proof, especially as more devices begin supporting the 6 GHz band.

Winner: ASUS GT-AXE11000, thanks to Wi-Fi 6E and its support for the new 6 GHz band.

4. Features and Ports
Both routers have similar advanced features, such as tri-band technology, support for AiMesh (enabling easy expansion into a mesh network), multiple Gigabit Ethernet ports, and robust security and gaming features. Both are also designed for high-performance gaming.
GT-AX11000 Pro, however, has a slightly upgraded processor and more ports, including a 2.5G WAN port and better support for more simultaneous devices.

Winner: ASUS GT-AX11000 Pro due to better port support and more powerful hardware.


5. Price
ASUS GT-AXE11000 tends to be more expensive due to the latest Wi-Fi 6E technology.
ASUS GT-AX11000 Pro is slightly cheaper but still offers excellent performance.

Winner: ASUS GT-AX11000 Pro if price is an important factor for you.


6. Gaming and Special Use
• Both routers are optimized for gaming with dedicated features for low latency, QoS (Quality of Service), and custom traffic management to enhance the gaming experience.
GT-AX11000 Pro has slightly better handling of more simultaneous devices, which can be advantageous in households with many gamers or heavy network loads.

Winner: ASUS GT-AX11000 Pro has a slight edge with better network management for more devices.


Summary:
ASUS GT-AXE11000 is the best router if you want the latest Wi-Fi 6E technology and maximum future-proofing, especially if you have or plan to use devices that support the 6 GHz band.
ASUS GT-AX11000 Pro is a more budget-friendly option that still offers excellent performance and features, and may be the better choice if you don’t need Wi-Fi 6E right now.


Recommendation: If you want to be future-proof and have the best performance for modern and upcoming devices, go with GT-AXE11000. If you want to save some money but still get powerful features and solid performance, GT-AX11000 Pro is an excellent choice.
 
Forget AI BS. GT-AXE11000 is an old mode router with discontinued hardware and no Asuswrt 5.0 support. Get newer GT-AX11000 Pro.
 
I have not owned either of these routers.

However, I previously relied on the 2-channel AX88U using Broadcom’s BCM4908 CPU; the 3-channel AXE-11000 (1x 2.4GHz / 1x 5GHz / 1x 6GHz) uses the seemingly-identical BCM49408. Both have Broadcom’s BCM43684 radio, with the AXE adding RF components for the 6GHz channel (I believe my same radio can handle 5GHz and 6GHz 802.11ax because they use the exact same technology, just on mildly different bands).

And I’m now using the AX-88U Pro, the 2-channel version of the 3-channel (1x 2.4GHz AX-11000 Pro you’re considering. Both use the same newer BCM4912 CPU and BCM6715 radio. The same CPU/radio combo is also in their 6GHz-capable big brother, the 4-channel AXE-16000 (1x 2.4GHz / 2x 5GHz / 1x 6GHz).



The TL;DR version is: Odds of being happy with the AXE-11000 are 🤷🏽‍♂️, the AX-11000 Pro should be solid and satisfying. If you really really want 6GHz now, skip the AXE-11000, splurge for the expensive but newer / superior AXE-16000.



The long version is:

Between the AXE11000 and the 11000 Pro, personally I think that being able to divide your 5GHz devices across two different channels would help more in the near term than having 6GHz, given how long it’ll take for 6GHz to be ubiquitous. I kinda wish now that I’d gotten the 11000 Pro to do that.

But the real problem is that the original AX88, and from what I’ve seen its big brother AXE-11000, kinda sucks.

With the old AX88, coverage was unusually poor in a basic single-floor home. I had enough stability issues to put a remote-controlled 110V plug on the router and the key fob on my dining table. And I mean the WiFi would randomly just die until the router was restarted. Often I could see coming because the 5GHz channel stopped working (or just disappeared!) first. I know it wasn’t mesh or “smart connect” related, because I run two separate SSIDs and manually choose the 2.4 or 5GHz network on each client. It could also get overloaded by things like a long list of static DHCP rules, or simple ad blocking (a JFFS script to load and DNS-block a published list of advertising domains).

I would search for info periodically to see if I had done something wrong. I’d always find some folks saying they loved their AX88 / AXE11000, others suffering similar troubles (some of whom got relief after firmware updates / rollbacks, factory resets, etc., but those never cured my ills).

The straw that broke the camel’s back was putting a WiiM in my bedroom, having it show poor WiFi signal, and getting random audio streaming interruptions. In an ordinary one-story house!

I know it’s not the house, because the AX88 Pro has since given me everything I wanted. I waited until it was out for months and others had it, I did research and didn’t find similarly random issues. It’s solid for weeks at a time, running Diversion plus Skynet (firewall for Merlin) plus a whole bunch of static DHCP rules. And sitting in the same place the old AX88 was, both 2.4GHz and 5GHz are fine even at the corners of the house.

And as newer replacements, the Pro models should definitely get firmware updates as the older ones, possibly longer.



So. Long version conclusion (and bonus rant).

I would absolutely, totally, 150% recommend the AX88U Pro, or if you need the 2x5GHz channels the AX11000 Pro, over “getting 6GHz” on the AXE. Get the AX11000 Pro. You can stop reading here or keep going if you want.

If you really, really want 6GHz now, consider splurging for the AX11000 Pro’s big brother, the AXE16000. It has the dual 5GHz channels of the AX11000 Pro, plus the 6GHz channel.

Or, just get the AX11000 Pro, and add 6GHz if needed.

I really believe that, for the near future, the best case for 6GHz is uncongested backhaul for large transfers. Devices only congest your WiFi channel while they’re using the channel, and you only “feel” congestion when the effects are perceptible. If you get a new phone with 6GHz, and checking WiFi or watching TikToks “feels” faster on 6GHz than 5GHz, your phone wasn’t the problem and isn’t solving things for your other 5GHz devices. Where you typically “feel” congestion (and where you can do something to reduce it), is when everyone tries to watch 4K movies at once, or your Xbox demands a 100GB Call of Duty update. So, add a 6GHz Ethernet bridge and switch to your home theater setup, plug in as many devices as you can (Xbox/Roku/etc.), get them off your 2.4/5GHz channels. Your Roku will maintain 4K streams, your Xbox will update faster, and you’ll reduce congestion for your other devices.

I snagged an Arris Surfboard Thruster (a 6GHz Ethernet bridge pair) cheap off Woot!. A 10GbE switch connects the bridge, a NAS and a Thunderbolt dock. Because of my ISP’s garbage upload speeds, a bridge is currently only useful for basic Internet while video editing, and I was using Powerline AV2. But now my ISP is teasing “coming soon” synchronous HSI. The Arris bridge can saturate gigabit locally, which means I’m prepared to (finally!!) have automatic online NAS sync/backup, without rearranging my house or burning substantial $$$ on Ethernet drops.

The Arris Surfboard Thruster kit (both base and receiver) is only $140 on Amazon right now, making the AXE11000 + Thruster only about $20 more than the AXE16000. To set up a 6GHz Ethernet bridge with the AXE16000, you’d need a separate bridge receiver, which will be more than $20. Even if you just use it to move your Xbox off WiFi, you’re more likely to notice large Call of Duty patches downloading faster, than a TikTok starting a fraction of a second sooner.

Some will disagree with me (especially the folks I’m jealous of, who had/have the original AX88 / AXE11000 without issues). But I hope it’s useful for you and maybe others in the future, trying to pick between these various models.
 
I have not owned either of these routers.

However, I previously relied on the 2-channel AX88U using Broadcom’s BCM4908 CPU; the 3-channel AXE-11000 (1x 2.4GHz / 1x 5GHz / 1x 6GHz) uses the seemingly-identical BCM49408. Both have Broadcom’s BCM43684 radio, with the AXE adding RF components for the 6GHz channel (I believe my same radio can handle 5GHz and 6GHz 802.11ax because they use the exact same technology, just on mildly different bands).

And I’m now using the AX-88U Pro, the 2-channel version of the 3-channel (1x 2.4GHz AX-11000 Pro you’re considering. Both use the same newer BCM4912 CPU and BCM6715 radio. The same CPU/radio combo is also in their 6GHz-capable big brother, the 4-channel AXE-16000 (1x 2.4GHz / 2x 5GHz / 1x 6GHz).



The TL;DR version is: Odds of being happy with the AXE-11000 are 🤷🏽‍♂️, the AX-11000 Pro should be solid and satisfying. If you really really want 6GHz now, skip the AXE-11000, splurge for the expensive but newer / superior AXE-16000.



The long version is:

Between the AXE11000 and the 11000 Pro, personally I think that being able to divide your 5GHz devices across two different channels would help more in the near term than having 6GHz, given how long it’ll take for 6GHz to be ubiquitous. I kinda wish now that I’d gotten the 11000 Pro to do that.

But the real problem is that the original AX88, and from what I’ve seen its big brother AXE-11000, kinda sucks.

With the old AX88, coverage was unusually poor in a basic single-floor home. I had enough stability issues to put a remote-controlled 110V plug on the router and the key fob on my dining table. And I mean the WiFi would randomly just die until the router was restarted. Often I could see coming because the 5GHz channel stopped working (or just disappeared!) first. I know it wasn’t mesh or “smart connect” related, because I run two separate SSIDs and manually choose the 2.4 or 5GHz network on each client. It could also get overloaded by things like a long list of static DHCP rules, or simple ad blocking (a JFFS script to load and DNS-block a published list of advertising domains).

I would search for info periodically to see if I had done something wrong. I’d always find some folks saying they loved their AX88 / AXE11000, others suffering similar troubles (some of whom got relief after firmware updates / rollbacks, factory resets, etc., but those never cured my ills).

The straw that broke the camel’s back was putting a WiiM in my bedroom, having it show poor WiFi signal, and getting random audio streaming interruptions. In an ordinary one-story house!

I know it’s not the house, because the AX88 Pro has since given me everything I wanted. I waited until it was out for months and others had it, I did research and didn’t find similarly random issues. It’s solid for weeks at a time, running Diversion plus Skynet (firewall for Merlin) plus a whole bunch of static DHCP rules. And sitting in the same place the old AX88 was, both 2.4GHz and 5GHz are fine even at the corners of the house.

And as newer replacements, the Pro models should definitely get firmware updates as the older ones, possibly longer.



So. Long version conclusion (and bonus rant).

I would absolutely, totally, 150% recommend the AX88U Pro, or if you need the 2x5GHz channels the AX11000 Pro, over “getting 6GHz” on the AXE. Get the AX11000 Pro. You can stop reading here or keep going if you want.

If you really, really want 6GHz now, consider splurging for the AX11000 Pro’s big brother, the AXE16000. It has the dual 5GHz channels of the AX11000 Pro, plus the 6GHz channel.

Or, just get the AX11000 Pro, and add 6GHz if needed.

I really believe that, for the near future, the best case for 6GHz is uncongested backhaul for large transfers. Devices only congest your WiFi channel while they’re using the channel, and you only “feel” congestion when the effects are perceptible. If you get a new phone with 6GHz, and checking WiFi or watching TikToks “feels” faster on 6GHz than 5GHz, your phone wasn’t the problem and isn’t solving things for your other 5GHz devices. Where you typically “feel” congestion (and where you can do something to reduce it), is when everyone tries to watch 4K movies at once, or your Xbox demands a 100GB Call of Duty update. So, add a 6GHz Ethernet bridge and switch to your home theater setup, plug in as many devices as you can (Xbox/Roku/etc.), get them off your 2.4/5GHz channels. Your Roku will maintain 4K streams, your Xbox will update faster, and you’ll reduce congestion for your other devices.

I snagged an Arris Surfboard Thruster (a 6GHz Ethernet bridge pair) cheap off Woot!. A 10GbE switch connects the bridge, a NAS and a Thunderbolt dock. Because of my ISP’s garbage upload speeds, a bridge is currently only useful for basic Internet while video editing, and I was using Powerline AV2. But now my ISP is teasing “coming soon” synchronous HSI. The Arris bridge can saturate gigabit locally, which means I’m prepared to (finally!!) have automatic online NAS sync/backup, without rearranging my house or burning substantial $$$ on Ethernet drops.

The Arris Surfboard Thruster kit (both base and receiver) is only $140 on Amazon right now, making the AXE11000 + Thruster only about $20 more than the AXE16000. To set up a 6GHz Ethernet bridge with the AXE16000, you’d need a separate bridge receiver, which will be more than $20. Even if you just use it to move your Xbox off WiFi, you’re more likely to notice large Call of Duty patches downloading faster, than a TikTok starting a fraction of a second sooner.

Some will disagree with me (especially the folks I’m jealous of, who had/have the original AX88 / AXE11000 without issues). But I hope it’s useful for you and maybe others in the future, trying to pick between these various models.

Thank you for your awesome advice. I am very grateful for this and am leaning towards the AX-88U Pro or AX-11000 Pro. The only difference now is the price: $327.00 for the AX-11000 Pro and $219.99 for the AX-88U Pro.

I think I will buy the AX-88U Pro because we only have 16 active connections to the current router, most of which are for IoT devices. Also, it’s just the two of us, my wife and me, living here.

Furthermore, we live in a flat, 66 m², so we don’t need more coverage.
So the decision is… drumroll!!!

AX-88U Pro!!

I’ll order it now.
Thanks to all of you for your participation and help.
You guys are awesome!

Michael
 
RT-AX88U Pro is popular choice with cheaper RT-AX86U Pro alternative in case you want more compact size unit and don't need 2x 2.5GbE ports. Both similar hardware, Asuswrt 5.0 compatible, Asuswrt-Merlin supported, etc.
 
RT-AX88U Pro is popular choice with cheaper RT-AX86U Pro alternative in case you want more compact size unit and don't need 2x 2.5GbE ports. Both similar hardware, Asuswrt 5.0 compatible, Asuswrt-Merlin supported, etc.
 
I would like to be a bit future-proof if the ISP wants to deliver faster network than today's 1Gbit/s. Hence I still stay with RT-AX88U Pro.
Ordered it now. It feels very good to have this work done.

Thank you!

Michael
 

Latest threads

Support SNBForums w/ Amazon

If you'd like to support SNBForums, just use this link and buy anything on Amazon. Thanks!

Sign Up For SNBForums Daily Digest

Get an update of what's new every day delivered to your mailbox. Sign up here!
Top