Where is there a scandal? They messed up, fessed up and dealt with the problem.
The problem is that numerous customers have stepped forward to confirm they encountered similar issues to those encountered by Steve. So, it doesn't look like a one-off incident, but a common one.
hat article fails to mention that the original purchase returned unopened was an "open box" purchase to begin with.
That article is indeed poorly written, and misleading at times. People should watch the two videos GN posted on this so far. The short story:
- GN ordered a motherboard from Newegg. They didn't notice at first that they were buying an Open Box.
- While in transit, they resolved the issue that would have required the board
- When the board arrived, they returned it unopened, under Newegg's regular return policy
- When Newegg received the board, they refused the refund, stating there was damage, thermal paste, and bent pins
- They told GN that they were returning it to them, but a few weeks later it still hadn't arrived. Support told him numerous times they would call him back, but they didn't (funny story: they started calling him back after he went public, and Newegg realized this wasn't a regular customer)
- Eventually they finally received the board back, weeks later. They opened it on camera. The box was severely mangled, there were indeed many damaged pins on the socket, and there was a huge RMA sticker on the motherboard.
- GN contacted Gigabyte about that RMA sticker to get more info. Turns out 6 months ago, Newegg sent it for RMA to Gigabyte. Gigabyte said it would cost 100$ to repair it. Newegg refused, so the board was returned to them.
So, Newegg did a number of dubious things, either by multiple mistakes, or out of malice.
- Newegg had a damaged board in their hand back last summer, that they attempted to get repaired, but ultimately declined
- They didn't remove the RMA sticker showing they knew the board was defective
- The board was put back in their inventory to sell as open box, which was purchased in December (months after Newegg had received it back)
- When customer got it and returned it without opening it, they refused to refund it, claiming the customer had damaged it, while it was clearly proven it was ALREADY damaged at the time they sold it. Whoever processed the return from GN should have seen that huge sticker proving the damage existed BEFORE they shipped it to GN
So, what kind of inventory management system:
a) Fails to remove RMA stickers when processing incoming merchandise
b) Puts it back for sale as-is, in a badly damaged box (that's beyond "open box" at that point)
c) On the second return fail to see their own sticker proving the board was already damaged before they sold it, and blame it on the customer instead
That's why it's getting more difficult to blame it on a simple mistake.