pete y testing
Very Senior Member
i think thats a bit of a cynical way to look at it as i think most manufactures are trying to keep some form of correctness to their labeling in at least they are all trying to have the same display numbers on their products well most of them anywayis a main reason most consumers over-spend.
And the vendors know what their deception is, but $$$ prevails.
having the max simultaneous wifi sync rate as part of the modem number is imho a good way to go , eg the rt-ac88u should have been called asus rt-ac3100-8 as opposed to the current asus rt-ac3100 which should have have been called the rt-ac3100-4 but at least most of the product line identifies its self by its max sync rate
dlink are a bit of a shocker , look at the dir-880L , i mean dir- is fine as it indicates its a router but 880L indicates nothing and has no useful purpose in identifying the product
the new taipan xdsl modem is the DSL-4320L which is a ac3200 class router with modem , again the dsl part is fine as it indicates its for xdsl but 432oL again what reference is that , the modems before that where the dsl-2900al and dsl-2890al again no real logic to the modem number and calling them by names of snakes is just a gimmick
netgear are no better with the r7000 and r8000
imho standardizing the model numbers to include the max simultaneous wifi sync rates for all manufactures would be the way to go
eg
im looking at asus here
66u would be rt-ac1750-4
68u - rt-ac1900ac-4
etc
its not going to happen for older stuff but it would be nice to think it could be possible in the future ( wishful thinking )