Thanks for confirming the fix. Appreciated!V.32E4 is working, that seems to have fixed it. Thanks!
Ya it comes from the sys tray, click it opens a browser window, thats about it, close it and wonder why it thinks it isn't connect when it clearly is.Have never seen it on the windows systray icon (just checking that's what you are referring to). I have see it in Firefox as a transient message bar that goes away once the reboot completes, but have never been able to figure out why. There's a chance that change I'm working on for the 32E3 DNS issues may be part of it, so give it a try when that final release come out.
@rotareneg @rtn66uftw
I've uploaded V32E4 for you to try (as well as anyone else that would like to give it a test prior to release). Hopefully this will resolve the access issue on the new build.
It's in a new download url
https://1drv.ms/f/s!Ainhp1nBLzMJmAFmjjskkJjm8Sei
The previous V32E3 has been pulled.
Does 32E4 instead of 32L4 for RT-N16 mean that it contains KRACK fix?
ASUS never released a KRACK fix for the N16. On the N16, there's very little difference between the E and L builds (there may be a couple of kernel changes in the N16/E, I'd have to double check).Does 32E4 instead of 32L4 for RT-N16 mean that it contains KRACK fix?
That's why L build only was available for RT-N16 recently. But now it is E build again.https://www.snbforums.com/threads/fork-asuswrt-merlin-374-43-lts-releases-v31e6.18914/
- A separate firmware release is provided which only supports the older AC68U rev A1,A2,B1 ('L' Builds). Users of the earlier rev AC68U's can continue on the original fork SDK/wireless drivers by moving to this release branch. IMPORTANT: Some fixes available in the 'E' Builds may not be included in the legacy build if they require new wireless drivers or the new ARM SDK. Please review the release notes/Changelog for further information.
I just haven't built the L Builds yet....they'll be coming with the final release.That's why L build only was available for RT-N16 recently. But now it is E build again.
Apr 2 23:56:23 smbd[799]: [2018/04/02 23:56:23.740369, 0] smbd/negprot.c:706(reply_negprot)
Apr 2 23:56:23 smbd[799]: No protocol supported !
Apr 2 23:56:24 smbd[800]: [2018/04/02 23:56:24.746564, 0] smbd/negprot.c:706(reply_negprot)
Apr 2 23:56:24 smbd[800]: No protocol supported !
Apr 2 23:56:25 smbd[802]: [2018/04/02 23:56:25.778148, 0] smbd/negprot.c:706(reply_negprot)
Apr 2 23:56:25 smbd[802]: No protocol supported !
Apr 2 23:56:26 smbd[803]: [2018/04/02 23:56:26.796577, 0] smbd/negprot.c:706(reply_negprot)
Apr 2 23:56:26 smbd[803]: No protocol supported !
When you are stuck at Connecting, please log into the router and post the output of
When you are stuck at Connecting, please log into the router and post the output of
nvram show | grep vpn_client. | grep -e 'state\|errno'
Here you go:
RT-AC66U:/tmp/home/root# nvram show | grep vpn_client. | grep -e 'state\|errno'
size: 54038 bytes (11498 left)
vpn_client1_errno=2
vpn_client2_state=0
vpn_client1_state=-1
vpn_client2_errno=0
Best regards.
OK...here's the scoop. Even though it's working, it is also detecting an error that is preventing the status from moving to 'Running' (adding the error reporting to the status page is on my todo list, but hasn't made it to the top yet)
In this case, it's detecting a routing conflict. My guess would be duplicate addresses on the server and client.
If you look in the syslog when first starting the client, you should see an entry
Ignoring conflicting routing rule
followed by the address subnet it's concerned about.
Did you restart the client and look for the syslog message I referenced?Could you tell me how can I check the error showed in nvram and fix it by OpenVPN client?
(Default Build - All supported routers)
7d9472b1423684536d8c4982d62e0bc039d8f82daa456f1c4d718784b3e27e9f RT-N16_374.43_32E4j9527.trx
73fe76d0e3f07353a2262bcf5772324f7ca54db10ba176ec758a9bfb6f6a4b1f RT-AC66U_374.43_32E4j9527.trx
505201654883992d91daca74dcaab9a2e3dcf52cae27cc7c60382a51f9390a54 RT-N66U_374.43_32E4j9527.trx
e7f57dd8592d14ba242c3b6d073e81225f43e4ad0fc8e83e7d3e0ab3d8d63293 RT-AC68U_374.43_32E4j9527.trx
6974ef96b6081b639f22d363cd89c8e6f68ec7f8294bda554f2b55f7c087d14e RT-AC56U_374.43_32E4j9527.trx
(Legacy Only Builds)
bbaadce84aa236c0d65e4cdb42280a292f26c5c1bc8214c6df6f6e80d279ef9e RT-AC68U_3.0.0.4_374.43_2-32L4j9527.trx
9199eccc6f17cdf636256a67654ad1f6ed610e05cb45a30d6d475b652e1d9211 RT-AC56U_3.0.0.4_374.43_2-32L4j9527.trx
13ae59a557402ce11a5aa364a4e0314b36f9065cccaea7ce2e3f96da74721caf RT-N16_3.0.0.4_374.43_2-32L4j9527.trx
7feafa4c95770d3df4abf7835feb05418331562c30a4843fda20a898a18ccf90 RT-AC66U_3.0.0.4_374.43_2-32L4j9527.trx
07b4ce97757a97800e848aae8ad91a45072e78dc3a43457ad46d6e7f059ac776 RT-N66U_3.0.0.4_374.43_2-32L4j9527.trx
Did you restart the client and look for the syslog message I referenced?
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!