GL.iNet worth a try? Any advantage over ASUS?

[Justinh]

I'm considering replacing my ASUS AC router. I'd like to consider an alternative, and the GL.iNet is the only reasonable thing I've seen as a possibility. I'd target the soon-to-be released Flint 2 (GL-MT6000).

My main concerns are security, manufacturer support, and client management in the firmware. I can't find an emulator for the Flint, so I can't peruse the firmware UI. (I like the ASUS UI and feature set.)

Does GL.iNet provide any advantages with respect to my concerns over ASUS?

 

[Tech9]

Every home AIO router will have some quirks. Avoid brand new and pre-order products - you'll be the beta tester, guaranteed. You are asking similar questions for about 2 months already. Just replace your RT-AC68U with something like RT-AX86U Pro or better and continue with your familiar Asuswrt UI. Your few wireless devices and a single wired are good even if you do nothing. Your router is still supported and may be good enough for your needs.

 

[L&LD]

The only possible advantage (depending on the model you get) it may have is the ability to be used in WISP mode. The ability to connect WAN via wireless.

Otherwise, the Asus routers are superior in every way (particularly with RMerlin firmware support).

 

[Justinh]

Your few wireless devices and a single wired are good even if you do nothing.

I know this doesn't make much of a difference, but my net landscape is a bit more complex than that, not sure why I described it like that at first. I guess I was thinking of the typical load/activity at any given time. I do have more wired devices, more wireless devices, and some VMs (bridged).

 

[Tech9]

No idea what your needs are. Your current router may be good enough or you may need a new one. Any ready-made solution will have pros and cons. Any home AIO router is disposable temporary solution. May last few years and meet your requirements well. You have to know what do you want and how do you want to proceed further. All you can get here is general advice. My advice to you - continue with what you already know. Less downtime, faster system configuration. If you feel this is not it - keep whatever you have running and explore other options. I personally will work towards x86 with pfSense/OPNsense with proper AP with VLAN support. Guaranteed to work Pro features now. Longer expected support and expandable.

 

[TheLostSwede]

CNX just got one in for review, but I guess it'll be a few weeks until the actual testing is done.

GL.iNet GL-MT6000 "Flint 2" WiFi 6 router review - Part 1: Unboxing, teardown, and first try - CNX Software

GL.iNet Flint 2 (also known as GL-MT6000) is a new WiFi 6 AX6000 router based on MediaTek MT7986 (Filogic 830) Arm SoC running of fork OpenWrt 23.05 and

www.cnx-software.com

 

[sfx2000]

Does GL.iNet provide any advantages with respect to my concerns over ASUS?

I think the main thing is that you can run OpenWRT directly if you like...

So far, feedback on both Flint and Flint2 has been fairly positive

 

[Justinh]

I installed OpenWRT on an old router just to see what the original GUI looked like. I was looking to see how easy it was to do some simple tasks. One task was to toggle off Internet access for a client. Unless I am blind, the only way I could see to do this was to write a firewall rule for the client. So that was a bust.

I looked at the GL.iNet firmware docs and see they made the UI more user friendly and even have an interface to easily break (all) network access for a client. Still not what I wanted but would do most of the time.

 

[sfx2000]

I installed OpenWRT on an old router just to see what the original GUI looked like. I was looking to see how easy it was to do some simple tasks. One task was to toggle off Internet access for a client. Unless I am blind, the only way I could see to do this was to write a firewall rule for the client. So that was a bust.

I looked at the GL.iNet firmware docs and see they made the UI more user friendly and even have an interface to easily break (all) network access for a client. Still not what I wanted but would do most of the time.

Seems like a pretty lame use case, but hey, that's your opinion...

 

[Preskitt.man]

I recently got a gl.inet router as a travel router. It is a low end device - the Opal SFT1200 ($39 at Amazon). Yes it is OpenWRT which can be technically rich but challenging, but they have their own front end to it that is relatively easy and straight forward. Very easy to setup Wireguard interface to my home system and OpenVPN client for my paid VPN service. Can't really comment on it's use as my everyday driver - but definitely meets my needs for a travel router - supports WISP, small (palm size), decent range, configurable, and cheap.

 

[TheLostSwede]

Review up over at CNX.

GL.iNet Flint 2 router review – Part 2: WiFi 6, 2.5GbE, WireGuard performance - CNX Software

In the first part of the review of the GL.iNet GL-MT6000 “Flint 2” WiFi 6 router, I had a look at the package content and the hardware design with a

www.cnx-software.com

 

[thecheapseats]

GL.iNet Flint 2 router review – Part 2: WiFi 6, 2.5GbE, WireGuard performance - CNX Software

In the first part of the review of the GL.iNet GL-MT6000 “Flint 2” WiFi 6 router, I had a look at the package content and the hardware design with a

www.cnx-software.com

I've had really good luck with their travel routers as wisp devices and the LuCl/openwrt features have been very handy- great value for functions they deliver... so far Gl.Inet has not over-promised or under-delivered...

early-on, I found three issues/bugs which they fixed very quickly (a few days) with an incremental-beta before rolling it into a release version several weeks later... very pro-reactive imo...

the flint2 came a few weeks ago but due to holidays I have yet to test it - so thanks for the link to the review which saved me time confirming the specs...

 

[RMinNJ]

Specs look really nice and if the openwrt gets patches and improvements promptly it seem great value for the money. I read there was some 2.4 range problem possibly being fixed?

 

[Tech9]

Review up over at CNX.

Not bad for $160 device. I like the small size too.

 

[koaly]

Not bad for $160 device. I like the small size too.

Good device, no doubts.
The question of the topic starter was about alternatives for upgrade of the existing ASUS AC router. As I can see the Asus GT-AX6000 would be a logical path and it is in the same price range as GL-MT6000.
In addition AX6000 has lots of benefits in Merlin FW, Aimesh etc.
As an example GL-MT6000 does not have a mesh feature. If mesh is required, Asus alternative is superior.
I use two of these devices and they work in Aimesh like a charm.

 

[HHawk]

Sorry for bumping an (somewhat) older thread and "hijacking" someone else's thread, but this is exactly what I deciding between:

• 3x ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AX6000
• 3x Flint 2 (GL-MT6000)

I can get both for almost the same price (3 of them), it's only 10 Euro difference in total...

My current setup (also running on MerlinWRT) exists out of 3x RT-AC86U routers (running AiMesh). It was a decent setup, but it's starting to age and also the performance is not that great (because of all the WIFI devices nowadays).
And ofcourse I am missing WIFI 6 along with (at least) 2x 2.5G ports on the router. So I am currently deciding on what router I should decide for the near future.

Furthermore; I have always had big issues with setting up a "Guest Network" (without disabling Hardware NAT or allow Intranet Access); guest logged on to the Guest Network, never get an IP-address assigned and therefor can use the connection. Guest Network should simply work, without the need to disable Hardware NAT or allowing intranet access. Perhaps it was simply an issue with the RT-AC86U routers (combined with MerlinWRT), but I do not know for sure. If this is the case as well with ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AX6000, I am inclined to got for the Flint 2 instead... But if the Guest Network works with the ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AX6000 along with AiMesh and MerlinWRT.... Well, that makes the choice easier.

Can someone please advice me with the above? Thank you!!


Added sidenote: I mean a normal Guest Network, I do not need Guest Network Pro.

 

[dave14305]

Flint 2 (GL-MT6000)

I just received mine from Amazon about 30 mins ago. Will flash OpenWrt snapshot tonight and see how it goes.

 

[Justinh]

I just received mine from Amazon about 30 mins ago. Will flash OpenWrt snapshot tonight and see how it goes.

Why not use the OEM firmware?

 

[dave14305]

Why not use the OEM firmware?

I don't know. I guess I've never used OEM firmware on any router I've owned since I bought a Linksys WRT54G way back when.

I have a whole build environment setup to customize my OpenWrt images with my exact configuration.

 

[sfx2000]

With the MT-6000 - stay with factory/stock firmware for now...

It's pretty good as it is...

OpenWRT on Master is still working on things - unless you want to be an Alpha Tester...