It is ready now. You can order from our website www.gocoax.com. Or from AmazonAny update? The week is almost over.
root@linksys:~# iperf3 -c 192.168.2.3
Connecting to host 192.168.2.3, port 5201
[ 4] local 192.168.2.10 port 33332 connected to 192.168.2.3 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 109 MBytes 918 Mbits/sec 0 990 KBytes
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec 0 990 KBytes
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec 0 990 KBytes
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec 0 1.06 MBytes
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec 0 1.06 MBytes
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec 0 1.06 MBytes
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 111 MBytes 930 Mbits/sec 0 1.17 MBytes
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec 0 1.17 MBytes
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec 0 1.17 MBytes
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 112 MBytes 938 Mbits/sec 0 1.28 MBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 937 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 935 Mbits/sec receiver
Yes, here is the MoCA PHY rate. It is about 3.5Gbps. we can get about 2.5Gbps real traffic throughput.So question for @gocoax. The MoCA link rates page on my adapters shows the following:
View attachment 21874
If I'm reading this correctly, it's telling me that the PHY speed is ~3.5Gbps. How is this even possible? I thought the max speed of MoCA 2.5 is 2.5Gbps?
I mean, it's somewhat academic since it's maxing out the gigabit ethernet connection already, so this is just curiosity on my part.
Very good, you get a nice speed.I recently received my gocoax adapters. Very pleasantly surprised by the performance. I thought it would be bad given that unfortunately my coax cabling in the walls is all RG59.
Using iperf3, between my resource constrained Linksys WRT1200AC that is known to max out around 940mbps on ethernet and my i7-4790s based server, I in fact get a solid ~935Mbps of throughput.
I wish I had a more capable device to act as the client for testing purposes, but unfortunately all my other devices are either big towers that I don't want to move upstairs or laptops with no ethernet port.
Code:root@linksys:~# iperf3 -c 192.168.2.3 Connecting to host 192.168.2.3, port 5201 [ 4] local 192.168.2.10 port 33332 connected to 192.168.2.3 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 109 MBytes 918 Mbits/sec 0 990 KBytes [ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec 0 990 KBytes [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec 0 990 KBytes [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec 0 1.06 MBytes [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec 0 1.06 MBytes [ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec 0 1.06 MBytes [ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 111 MBytes 930 Mbits/sec 0 1.17 MBytes [ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec 0 1.17 MBytes [ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec 0 1.17 MBytes [ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 112 MBytes 938 Mbits/sec 0 1.28 MBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 937 Mbits/sec 0 sender [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 935 Mbits/sec receiver
You're not going to get better than that for point to point, as the Ethernet NIC is GigE. But since MoCA is shared medium, you can get a better aggregate throughput for multiple devices.Using iperf3, between my resource constrained Linksys WRT1200AC that is known to max out around 940mbps on ethernet and my i7-4790s based server, I in fact get a solid ~935Mbps of throughput.
I wish I had a more capable device to act as the client for testing purposes, but unfortunately all my other devices are either big towers that I don't want to move upstairs or laptops with no ethernet port.
With point to point. MoCA 2.5 can give you full 1Gbps bidirectional traffic. For MoCA2.0 bounded, you only can get 1Gbps bidirectional traffic.You're not going to get better than that for point to point, as the Ethernet NIC is GigE. But since MoCA is shared medium, you can get a better aggregate throughput for multiple devices.
Very good, you get a nice speed.
Nice. Can your Unifi AP support Wi-Fi Mesh. If so, you will get a fast, stable seamless roaming Wi-Fi network.Indeed. I was expecting much worse performance. The cable in my house is old and unmarked, but has a diameter of 6.15mm measured with my digital vernier caliper, which would make it RG59. That said, it's full copper core and some of the cables without terminators on them appear to be shielded too, as I can see the shielding. So perhaps the cable diameter is misleading (although RG6 is supposed to be 6.9mm) and I've got something other than RG59.
I disconnected all the other cables from my MoCA network so the point to point link is isolated and only carriers the MoCA signal. Anyway, I'm well pleased. My house is pretty large and I'm using the MoCA link as a backhaul for my Ubiquiti Unifi APs.
You're not going to get better than that for point to point, as the Ethernet NIC is GigE. But since MoCA is shared medium, you can get a better aggregate throughput for multiple devices.
Nice. Can your Unifi AP support Wi-Fi Mesh. If so, you will get a fast, stable seamless roaming Wi-Fi network.
In MoCA one device is the "Network Coordinator" since the architecture is CDMA/CD; it's responsible to sending the beacon. Beacons (bits of network information) are used for devices to join the network. Typically you should not enable Preferred NC and allow the adapters to auto-negotiate who is the current Network Coordinator.What does preferred NC do? I have that on mine, but I did not activate.
I only enabled D-Ext as that is how I understood the QuickStart Guide #6 step 3 (Step3: Go to the page 'Security settings', enable D-Ext band security setting and select a proper password. Save configuration and reboot the device.)Also, why is network security enabled on the D-Ext but your MoCA setup shows the "In Scan List" on the D-High?
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!