Why not mount this stuff from a NAS and skip the USB completely?
Because it's custom configuration things that are being run from it. You can't access the NAS until after the router is up... But you need the NAS to start the router... Doesn't work...
I'm not hosting files from the USB, it's entware & amtm & diversion & that stuff. I don't need fast access or anything like that, I have 3 NAS servers & a windows server & a Pi, this is purely for the router to use.
I'm not aware of any such recommendations.
I've actually seen it stated in a number of places, but
this guide is one for a reference, the others were essentially the same, I've definitely seen it specified at least 3 different places, but nothing ever says why.
Click USB Mode option to use 'USB 2.0'
you can get USB 3 @ 32GB for under $10 these days
Yeah, but the problem is that USB thumb drives are not ideal. 1 BIG issue is if you have a USB thumbdrive plugged into your router it gets super hot. That's not ideal. Plus I've burnt out a few of them already. That's why I'm using an SSD instead. The USB Port doesn't get hot, it's designed to work constantly aside from thumbdrives which are designed for short bursts of use not continual use.
it's time for a different router that doesn't play these games to begin with
They don't exist. ANY router would need external storage to handle things like entware & Diversion.
Diversion is like using Pihole and well, if you want to run such apps you should just use a RPI that's self contained and runs all of this stuff off a SD card OS + apps instead of a cheap router in the first place
So a PiHole is slower, more complicated, more prone to errors, & if there's an error you need to physically be there to fix it half the time. It's not an even comparison. Plus the fact that a Pi running an OS off an SD card burns SD cards, they typically last 2 years, less sometimes. But with the PiHole vs Diversion you are adding 3 potential points of failure for no reason, for something that has less features, is slower, & has to be maintained more. No thank you.
The only concern regarding USB 3 is it possibly causing interference on the 2.4GHz band
Ah. If that's the case I'm fine. I use an access point for the Wireless anyway.
Use an SSD like @Tech9 said.
That's what I'm talking about... An SSD in an enclosure
Swap on a USB stick is a bad idea to start with. It's just a workaround on routers.
Which is why, well at least part of why, I'm using an SSD instead
So it sounds like the reason was due to an issue with interference that I don't really have to worry about. that makes sense. Thanks for the replies everyone.