Thank you all for your opinions and advices. I am searching for a 871 model in my country, I wasn't able to find one store selling this. In fact, from what I see, QNAP is not very popular, sold here, probably due to the price. I can find any model of Synology but no Qnap x71 family.
My current "nas" is a powerfull desktop with i7, with 5 HDDs in it, some of them are in RAID mirror. The real disappointment last days was to see that some of my important data, stored on RAID is corrupted due to NTFS problems. So I need first a NAS on which I can rely, and I need one fast
During the researche I've done in the past weeks, I saw the results of a test, comparing the time to rebuild a raid 5, after a disk is lost. Well, the i3 CPU is doing this task much faster than an Atom CPU. So this is a clear advantage of an i CPU in any nas, from my point of view this is a selling point of Qnap.
Coming back to my requirements:
- the virtual machines are going to run on my laptop or on my desktop. So I don't think I need CPU power to run virtual images on the nas
- I will use the nas for data storage, this is my first requirement, this is why I'm looking to buy an 8 disk nas.
- currently I have a PS3 and an Apple TV as media servers. I'm playing multimedia files with the PS3 (I'm running PS3 Media server on the PC), I want to use it also in the future.
- the data volume stored on my nas will be pretty big, indeed I will not have a huge data volume transferred daily, but when I'll need it I want to copy the data fast, or to find it and access it fast.
- I've used the demos for both Synology and Qnap, Qnap interface I find it to be better (at least for me),to have less delays in the interface comparing with it with the Synology one.
- very important for me: data encryption. I plan to encrypt the data I'm storing on my nas, so I'm not very sure if an Atom CPU will do the job well in this situation.
My current "nas" is a powerfull desktop with i7, with 5 HDDs in it, some of them are in RAID mirror. The real disappointment last days was to see that some of my important data, stored on RAID is corrupted due to NTFS problems. So I need first a NAS on which I can rely, and I need one fast
During the researche I've done in the past weeks, I saw the results of a test, comparing the time to rebuild a raid 5, after a disk is lost. Well, the i3 CPU is doing this task much faster than an Atom CPU. So this is a clear advantage of an i CPU in any nas, from my point of view this is a selling point of Qnap.
Coming back to my requirements:
- the virtual machines are going to run on my laptop or on my desktop. So I don't think I need CPU power to run virtual images on the nas
- I will use the nas for data storage, this is my first requirement, this is why I'm looking to buy an 8 disk nas.
- currently I have a PS3 and an Apple TV as media servers. I'm playing multimedia files with the PS3 (I'm running PS3 Media server on the PC), I want to use it also in the future.
- the data volume stored on my nas will be pretty big, indeed I will not have a huge data volume transferred daily, but when I'll need it I want to copy the data fast, or to find it and access it fast.
- I've used the demos for both Synology and Qnap, Qnap interface I find it to be better (at least for me),to have less delays in the interface comparing with it with the Synology one.
- very important for me: data encryption. I plan to encrypt the data I'm storing on my nas, so I'm not very sure if an Atom CPU will do the job well in this situation.