Swistheater
Very Senior Member
should include 0::1@53 in the listening addresses otherwise it acts as a DNS64 , and will not work without the presence of an IPV4 connection.
It looks like an ipv6 resolver is ignored if ipv6 isn’t enabled on the router. Is that true for your setup?I don't think ipv6 is properly integrated, yet, as the ipv6 dns servers selected in the GUI are not added to the stubby.yml file.
Some IPV4 resolvers will do IPV6 as well as IPV4. You can add the IPV6 resolvers manually in the GUI. However, stubby.yml will needIt looks like an ipv6 resolver is ignored if ipv6 isn’t enabled on the router. Is that true for your setup?
https://github.com/RMerl/asuswrt-merlin.ng/blob/master/release/src/router/rc/services.c#L1930
listen_addresses:
- 127.0.0.1@53
- 0::1@53
server=/pool.ntp.org/1.1.1.1
server=127.0.0.1#53
server=0::1#53
Some IPV4 resolvers will do IPV6 as well as IPV4. You can add the IPV6 resolvers manually in the GUI. However, stubby.yml will need
Code:listen_addresses: - 127.0.0.1@53 - 0::1@53
and dnsmasq.conf.add will need
Code:server=/pool.ntp.org/1.1.1.1 server=127.0.0.1#53 server=0::1#53
I’m saying when the firmware writes the stubby.yml, it won’t write an ipv6 upstream resolver from your GUI selection if ipv6 (native, passthru, 6to4, etc) isn’t enabled on the router, regardless of how dnsmasq or stubby is listening.Some IPV4 resolvers will do IPV6 as well as IPV4. You can add the IPV6 resolvers manually in the GUI. However, stubby.yml will need
Code:listen_addresses: - 127.0.0.1@53 - 0::1@53
and dnsmasq.conf.add will need
Code:server=/pool.ntp.org/1.1.1.1 server=127.0.0.1#53 server=0::1#53
it isn't even doing it when it is enabled, so IVP6 native is showing enabled on mine and when I add only an IPV6 resolver and no IPV4 I get no IPV6 addresses added to the stubby.yml and it doesn't say it is listening there either, so safe to assume it isn't listing it at all.I’m saying when the firmware writes the stubby.yml, it won’t write an ipv6 upstream resolver from your GUI selection if ipv6 (native, passthru, 6to4, etc) isn’t enabled on the router, regardless of how dnsmasq or stubby is listening.
Ok, thanks for that confirmation. I don’t known that it matters whether stubby listens on ipv6 on the router, since only dnsmasq will send it requests locally, loopback to loopback.it isn't even doing it when it is enabled, so IVP6 native is showing enabled on mine and when I add only an IPV6 resolver and no IPV4 I get no IPV6 addresses added to the stubby.yml and it doesn't say it is listening there either, so safe to assume it isn't listing it at all.
Any client you filtered with another server other than the router it will bypass Dot. That's why when you tested it, it says DOT is off.Thanks.
Noticed that if I plug in any client and choose a filter other than Router or None DOT is then OFF according to the CF site. Any chosen server other than CF says DoT OFF. Wonder if that's bogus?
these addresses are already occupied by dnsmasq unless default config (listening interface, binding, dns port) was changed by hands.Some IPV4 resolvers will do IPV6 as well as IPV4. You can add the IPV6 resolvers manually in the GUI. However, stubby.yml will need
Code:listen_addresses: - 127.0.0.1@53 - 0::1@53
same, dnsmasq already listens to that addresses, no point to loop it into itself.and dnsmasq.conf.add will need
Code:server=/pool.ntp.org/1.1.1.1 server=127.0.0.1#53 server=0::1#53
thanks for report, ipv6 addresses were skipped due bug, fixed now.it isn't even doing it when it is enabled, so IVP6 native is showing enabled on mine and when I add only an IPV6 resolver and no IPV4 I get no IPV6 addresses added to the stubby.yml and it doesn't say it is listening there either, so safe to assume it isn't listing it at all.
Seems to be the case from my experimentation, just don't know how to populate that client list. Stuff apears when it feels like it.
I've been a Stubby tester for several months. While not a programmer I do a lot of "try it if it dosen't work try something else." In this case the dnsmasq.conf.add recommend by skeal (which we used in our Stubby testing before- https://github.com/Xentrk/Stubby-Installer-Asuswrt-Merlin) did not work for me. So, I tried something else and it worked. I really feel Stubby should not be listening on port 53 but something like port 5453 as we have done before. Let dnsmasq cache do its thing.these addresses are already occupied by dnsmasq unless default config (listening interface, binding, dns port) was changed by hands.
same, dnsmasq already listens to that addresses, no point to loop it into itself.
I've been a Stubby tester for several months. While not a programmer I do a lot of "try it if it dosen't work try something else." In this case the dnsmasq.conf.add recommend by skeal (which we used in our Stubby testing before- https://github.com/Xentrk/Stubby-Installer-Asuswrt-Merlin) did not work for me. So, I tried something else and it worked. I really feel Stubby should not be listening on port 53 but something like port 5453 as we have done before. Let dnsmasq cache do its thing.
Edit: is it really a good idea to have dnsmasq and stubby listening on the same port?
Fixed it by toggling apps analysis off and on.AX88U dirty upgrade form alpha 1, Bandwidth monitor page doesn't show any speeds on the speedometer looking gauges. Log shows "hour_monitor: dpi engine doesn't exist"
Edit: is it really a good idea to have dnsmasq and stubby listening on the same port?
Guess I do no see your point. Same port traffic parallels through while different ports daisy chains traffic into dnsmasq then stubby-getdns and reverse.Why not? Different interfaces, so there is nothing wrong in reusing the same port. As mentioned, it allows for the built-in resolver to also interface with it, just by changing the interface IP.
he said that will be in a future release.Guess I do no see your point. Same port traffic parallels through while different ports daisy chains traffic into dnsmasq then stubby-getdns and reverse.
Can you give us a way to modify stubby.yml? There are settings I would like to change that are not covered in the gui.
Sent from my SM-T380 using Tapatalk
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!