Thanks for the reminder, Claykin. I must be too sleepy from too much Buffalo router testing...
Why High Power Routers Don't Improve Range
I was wondering when we'd see part 2...
Thanks for the reminder, Claykin. I must be too sleepy from too much Buffalo router testing...
Why High Power Routers Don't Improve Range
Take a look @ the coax in your house. See if it says RG6 or CATV6. That's what you want. If it says RG59 that's old school for off air viewing only. Too much loss will occur at high frequencies with RG59 at lengths longer than a few feet.
Are your coax cables home run or is it a loop system (daisy chain)? Does the cable go where you'll need it to connect to AP's?
You mean this reference?I was wondering when we'd see part 2...
That would be hereThe best way to improve wireless coverage is as the pros do: adding access points. But that deserves its own article.
If the coax outlets are close enough to the TV, you can skip the APs. MoCA adapter will give you Ethernet out.I have TV's where most of the action will happen so yes AP stationed there would be effective, but do AP's directly impact the total bandwidth available wirelessly?
Adapters have in/out. Read the reviews.I was thinking if i have the coax idea working, do i need splitters as the TV would be there as well? Or is that why there is an in and out for the device? Which one would go where?
Adapters have in/out. Read the reviews.
Also read the MoCA posts in this Forum.
You mean this reference?
Buffalo "ac" Part 2! I know off topic but you brought it up first.
Not really. You need to find an area where the coax is exposed and check. Perhaps taking off a wall plate and pulling out slack coax. Or where the splitter is.Ive spoken to my dad, the coax used to his knowledge is unknown, however what i can tell you that the house was built in 1997. Does that help tell which cable is being used in my home?
All in-home TV coax is 75 ohm.
50 ohm coax is used for most non-TV RF signals.
All in-home TV coax is 75 ohm.
50 ohm coax is used for most non-TV RF signals.
In TV coax, RG6 is popular but there are types that have double shields, lower losses, etc. For all but rare cases, RG6 is fine.
That said, some home TV coax used RG59 - it's smaller in diameter than RG6 and more lossy. OK for short runs. The cheap-a** builder for my town home used RG59 - for 150 ft. runs. Save him all of $2, I'll bet. This is late 1980's.
I think you mean wireless bridges. Cisco Linksys WES610N is an example.
Then you are going to need to get Ethernet from the top and bottom floors to the center floor.
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!