This is more or less for you information - I mean, that it just might be of some help for ones struggling with the wifi on their Apple devices...
As we know, last months have been a huge problem for many, who are using 10.10 Yosemite - Apple has its' forums full of long threads on the issues and some have deemed whole thing as a disaster and all this might add up to confusion, if there are other "coincidences", which might turn out to be problems without any solution.
So... I have a Macbook Pro which has been working on wifi without problems for years on any networks and both bands - but recently a strange problem occured.
Macbook worked on any channel of 5 GHz band before the problem surfaced - all from 36 to 140, just as my Windows laptop and few Android devices, but now for some reason Macbook just plainly refused to see my router on channels 52 and up. Windows machine and Androids still worked just fine...
Then I took the Macbook to work with me to try out the guest wifi at the office - we have wide wifi coverage all around the office with multiple AP's on both bands and on channels all across the frequency bands. Funny or not, but Macbook connected and worked just fine there and saw all AP's on 5 GHz band - connected on channels 60, 108, 132 - take your pick... Then I came home and observed the same old behaviour - network was not visible, period. Absolutely invisible - Wifi Explorer did not show any trace of my network. No dice...
I was thinking, that maybe this is really something about these problems with Yosemite and started all kind of tinkering until I found few lines on system log, which explained everything and saved me from further waste of time.
When I was at work, there was
When I got home, I got
There you go! Asus with hardcoded 'EU' country code, channels 52...140 and Apple devices -> no dice.
No need for trying to find a way around this. This is "by design" with this combination of devices - or is it?
As we know, last months have been a huge problem for many, who are using 10.10 Yosemite - Apple has its' forums full of long threads on the issues and some have deemed whole thing as a disaster and all this might add up to confusion, if there are other "coincidences", which might turn out to be problems without any solution.
So... I have a Macbook Pro which has been working on wifi without problems for years on any networks and both bands - but recently a strange problem occured.
Macbook worked on any channel of 5 GHz band before the problem surfaced - all from 36 to 140, just as my Windows laptop and few Android devices, but now for some reason Macbook just plainly refused to see my router on channels 52 and up. Windows machine and Androids still worked just fine...
Then I took the Macbook to work with me to try out the guest wifi at the office - we have wide wifi coverage all around the office with multiple AP's on both bands and on channels all across the frequency bands. Funny or not, but Macbook connected and worked just fine there and saw all AP's on 5 GHz band - connected on channels 60, 108, 132 - take your pick... Then I came home and observed the same old behaviour - network was not visible, period. Absolutely invisible - Wifi Explorer did not show any trace of my network. No dice...
I was thinking, that maybe this is really something about these problems with Yosemite and started all kind of tinkering until I found few lines on system log, which explained everything and saved me from further waste of time.
When I was at work, there was
Code:
9.03.15 19:38:18.000 kernel[0]: en1: 802.11d country code set to 'FI'.
9.03.15 19:38:18.000 kernel[0]: en1: Supported channels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 100 104 108 112 116 120 124 128 132 136 140
When I got home, I got
Code:
9.03.15 20:44:22.000 kernel[0]: en1: 802.11d country code set to 'EU'.
9.03.15 20:44:22.000 kernel[0]: en1: Supported channels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 36 40 44 48
There you go! Asus with hardcoded 'EU' country code, channels 52...140 and Apple devices -> no dice.
No need for trying to find a way around this. This is "by design" with this combination of devices - or is it?
Last edited: