I like to follow along, even when the error isn't affecting me.
I'm finding this discussion about WLCEVENTD pretty frustrating, because there are statements about "the regular system log" or "regular system messages". If one is running scribe, these are not intelligible statements. Scribe stops syslogd and klogd, which are the "regular" system processes, and replaces them with syslog-ng. Messages that are not otherwise filtered end up in the messages file, specifically /opt/var/log/messages. They do not end up in /tmp/syslog.log, which should be a link and not a file; when it is a file you might call it the regular system log, but then you are in the wrong thread.
So I can't tell from this train whether syslog-ng is running, or syslogd, or both. I can't tell where the log messages are being quoted from.
@cmkelley is saying something similar, but more politely.
I am not in a place where I can check my own logs to be sure,
but is it not true there cannot be a message logged to /opt/var/log/messages that has a program id of "syslog"? Is it not always "syslog-ng"? Is this not a sign that syslog-ng is not set up correctly? Purely rhetorical. EDIT: No, it is not true. But maybe the absence of a hostname is similarly indicative, unless it has been redacted as suggested
Also, to lighten the mood, 3.25 is out! And congrats to
@cmkelley on being elected to the 1,000 message thread club!