Hi,
I recently purchased a Synology Disk Station 218+ with 2 x 3Tb HDD, and a 6Tb External HDD. I'm looking for thoughts on how to structure these drives to accomplish my goals.
My goal is to setup a network drive that hosts all of our family's media (pictures, music, videos) so that they are accessible by everyone and useable by 2 laptops and through other devices, and which is backed up, and a network drive that our 2 laptops back up to.
5 structures that I can think of are as follows:
1) Setup one disk on the DS to host the media, and then setup the ext HDD to backup that disk. Then, set up the other disk on the DS with 2 volumes, one to take the time machine backups from my mac, and the other to take the backups from my pc. Downside is no redundancy, only backups. I'm not really sure that redundancy is a problem for me, so much as protection of data is. As long as the data is backed up, I could probably live with the downtime needed to set a new drive backup.
2) Setup the DS in Raid1, with media stored on the DS, and ext HD plugged into DS to backup media. Then use another ext HDD connected to wifi router for the computer backups, again splitting the ext hdd into 2 volumes, one for each computer
3) Setup the DS in Raid1, with media stored on the DS, and ext HD plugged into DS to backup media. rpurchase second 1 bay NAS for computer backups
4) return ext hdd and DS 218+, and purchase 4 bay nas (418?), structure 2 hdd in raid 1 for media, one to backup the media, and one split into 2 volumes for computer backups. downside is this will cost probably $200 more.
5) setup DS in raid 1 with 3 volumes on a drive, one for media, one each for the backups, ext HDD backing up the whole thing. in this setup i would have redundancy and backup, my concern with this setup is the potential for malware in the media files volume polluting the backups, but i'm not sure if using structure 1 and physically isolating the media drive from the backup drive even solves this issue, so maybe this is a moot point.
4 is probably the more conventional approach, but interested in your thoughts.
Thanks
I recently purchased a Synology Disk Station 218+ with 2 x 3Tb HDD, and a 6Tb External HDD. I'm looking for thoughts on how to structure these drives to accomplish my goals.
My goal is to setup a network drive that hosts all of our family's media (pictures, music, videos) so that they are accessible by everyone and useable by 2 laptops and through other devices, and which is backed up, and a network drive that our 2 laptops back up to.
5 structures that I can think of are as follows:
1) Setup one disk on the DS to host the media, and then setup the ext HDD to backup that disk. Then, set up the other disk on the DS with 2 volumes, one to take the time machine backups from my mac, and the other to take the backups from my pc. Downside is no redundancy, only backups. I'm not really sure that redundancy is a problem for me, so much as protection of data is. As long as the data is backed up, I could probably live with the downtime needed to set a new drive backup.
2) Setup the DS in Raid1, with media stored on the DS, and ext HD plugged into DS to backup media. Then use another ext HDD connected to wifi router for the computer backups, again splitting the ext hdd into 2 volumes, one for each computer
3) Setup the DS in Raid1, with media stored on the DS, and ext HD plugged into DS to backup media. rpurchase second 1 bay NAS for computer backups
4) return ext hdd and DS 218+, and purchase 4 bay nas (418?), structure 2 hdd in raid 1 for media, one to backup the media, and one split into 2 volumes for computer backups. downside is this will cost probably $200 more.
5) setup DS in raid 1 with 3 volumes on a drive, one for media, one each for the backups, ext HDD backing up the whole thing. in this setup i would have redundancy and backup, my concern with this setup is the potential for malware in the media files volume polluting the backups, but i'm not sure if using structure 1 and physically isolating the media drive from the backup drive even solves this issue, so maybe this is a moot point.
4 is probably the more conventional approach, but interested in your thoughts.
Thanks