Syslog filled with errors 386.7_2

[johndoe85]

kernel: tuple errors

RT-AX86U

Jul 31 08:21:26 kernel:         STATUS[ IPS_SEEN_REPLY_BIT IPS_ASSURED_BIT IPS_CONFIRMED_BIT IPS_SRC_NAT_DONE_BIT IPS_DST_NAT_DONE_BIT IPS_BLOG_BIT ]
Jul 31 08:21:26 kernel:     NFCT: ct<0xffffffc02d01fb00>, master<0x          (null)>
Jul 31 08:21:26 kernel:         F_NAT<ffffffc02a36e478> keys[0x00000000 0x00000000] dir<DIR_ORIG>
Jul 31 08:21:26 kernel:         help<0x          (null)> helper<NONE> status=8000019e refcnt=2 zone=0
Jul 31 08:21:26 kernel: tuple ffffffc02d01fb98: 6 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:52971 -> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:443
Jul 31 08:21:26 kernel: tuple ffffffc02d01fbd0: 6 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:443 -> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:52971
Jul 31 08:21:26 kernel:         STATUS[ IPS_SEEN_REPLY_BIT IPS_ASSURED_BIT IPS_CONFIRMED_BIT IPS_SRC_NAT_BIT IPS_SRC_NAT_DONE_BIT IPS_DST_NAT_DONE_BIT IPS_BLOG_BIT ]
Jul 31 08:21:26 kernel: blog_link:overwriting ct_p=ffffffc02c30a650, new_ct=ffffffc02d01fb00 idx=0
Jul 31 08:21:26 kernel:     NFCT: ct<0xffffffc02c30a650>, master<0x          (null)>

What is this and what to do about it?

 

[ColinTaylor]

That looks like debug information from conntrack. Have you changed the router's logging level, or installed any scripts that mess with flow control (e.g. wireguard)?

 

[johndoe85]

That looks like debug information from conntrack. Have you changed the router's logging level, or installed any scripts that mess with flow control (e.g. wireguard)?

Wireguard is installed.
Conntrak idk about.


Edit. The debug was on, what should it be on?

 

[johndoe85]

A default button for loglevel wouldn't hurt.

 

[evlo]

is this the default log level thing?

 

[Serkan K.]

Upgraded from 386.7 to 386.7_2 half an hour ago doing the following and everything seems to be okay.
- Unmounted and removed the usb rebooted.
- Upgraded the firmware and rebooted.
- After reboot waited a few minutes and unplugged the power
- Waited for half a minute, plugged in the USB and the power.

All reboots are manual reboots ( power off, wait, and power on)

 

[FernandoF]

View attachment 43245
is this the default log level thing?

@evlo: that's where you set the log levels, and these are the default values:

 

[johndoe85]

@evlo: that's where you set the log levels, and these are the default values:

Ok but then I have defaults log level values set at least.