ER-6120 is ok for $ , but has issues
I have been running an ER6120 for two weeks and will likely have to send it back.
Here is my 2 cents
Setup
- running latest firmware
- dual ISPs PPPOE and Cable
- 20 devices on the network
- Heavy media streaming (iTunes, netflix etc)
-
Pros
1. it is a fast router for a home environment and handles basic load balancing well.
2. seems to be well built
3. fast admin GUI
4. fairly well featured, but lacking some.
5. stable, I have had no reason to reboot it. running 14 days straight so far.
6. low cost.
Cons
1. The GUI is usuable , but TPLink should really spend a few more bucks and get a better translator, because some's menus aren't very clear.
2. Load balancing works but needs refinement. For example you can't route by URL only ip addy. There are no options to force a persistent connection to one ISP for applications that need it. (VPNs for example)
3. The built in pptp client VPN functionality needs more options, but it is a moot point because once u get the tunnel up it is not possible to route any traffic down it. (tplink have verified this)
4. pptp server works, but the setup menus are unclear and really need a clean up. For example u set up a new server for each client.
5. tech support is slow to respond and the one emailing me clearly has no understanding of the product.
6. The static routes menu is basically useless. You can't set up routes for vlans, Vpn interfaces, only wan1/2 or LAN. For example if you set up port 5 as a separate vlan you can route it anywhere ... again according to tech support.
Bottom line... if u need basic dual wan with home router features it is capable, but don't expect to be able to use all the advertised smb features.
one other note.. not sure why no one has mentioned that the security flaw is in the upnp implementation. it is a Broadcom SDK issue and effects 75% of soho routers out there including tplink. Check out this for details.
http://www.defensecode.com/public/DefenseCode_Broadcom_Security_Advisory.pdf