Namrustler
Occasional Visitor
I'm seeking clarification of a paragraph in the VPN Director wiki.
Under Various Notes is:
I generally have the first and second VPN clients configured for PIA and StrongVPN, respectively. I have 3-4 IPs assigned to client 1 and 3-4 IPs assigned to client 2. There is no overlap in the IPs between clients 1 and 2; they are mutually exclusive. In the past, the killswitch, as far as I knew, was independent between VPN clients.
If VPN client 1 triggers the killswitch, does the statement about no traffic going through the lower priority clients (in my case VPN client 2) mean devices assigned to VPN client 2 are blocked due to the state of the killswitch on VPN client 1, or are these devices leaking out through the WAN? The latter would be highly undesirable for my requirements.
Also in the last sentence of the note says: You will generally want your lowest priority client to use the killswitch if you use multiple clients. Does this imply you shouldn't use the killswitch at all on higher priority VPN clients, or rather just make sure the lowest priority VPN client uses the killswitch?
Does the answer change if you have an overlap of IPs assigned to the clients?
Thanks.
Under Various Notes is:
- Keep in mind that the killswitch will affect how lower priority clients work. If a higher priority client triggers its killswitch, then no traffic will go through the lower priority clients. You will generally want your lowest priority client to use the killswitch if you use multiple clients.
I generally have the first and second VPN clients configured for PIA and StrongVPN, respectively. I have 3-4 IPs assigned to client 1 and 3-4 IPs assigned to client 2. There is no overlap in the IPs between clients 1 and 2; they are mutually exclusive. In the past, the killswitch, as far as I knew, was independent between VPN clients.
If VPN client 1 triggers the killswitch, does the statement about no traffic going through the lower priority clients (in my case VPN client 2) mean devices assigned to VPN client 2 are blocked due to the state of the killswitch on VPN client 1, or are these devices leaking out through the WAN? The latter would be highly undesirable for my requirements.
Also in the last sentence of the note says: You will generally want your lowest priority client to use the killswitch if you use multiple clients. Does this imply you shouldn't use the killswitch at all on higher priority VPN clients, or rather just make sure the lowest priority VPN client uses the killswitch?
Does the answer change if you have an overlap of IPs assigned to the clients?
Thanks.