am i correct in that a wifi signal can only be as strong as the sender (AP for example) and the transmit power of your computer or adapter? for example if i have a 1000mw wifi booster, it is not worth it since the other communicating end (my laptop) cannot transmit that far? doesn't wifi transmit distance rely on both devices that are "talking to each other?
Getting back to the original question by the OP:
1000mw is 30 dBm at the power amplifier - add 3dB of gain, and you're at 33dBm - or effective radiated power of 2 watts - this is not good - read below...
Most Stations (clients) are power limited to about 16-18 dBm - or 40 to 63 mw at the PA, and depending on antenna design in a typical laptop, tablet or handset of 0 to 2 dB of gain - so best case is about 16 to 20 dB
Now this is all transmit power - most AP's, believe it or not, max out about 23 dBm on 20Mhz channels - wide channels is a bit lower.
23 dBm is about 200 mW, which to be a good neighbour is about as much as you want.
Now why I am bringing this up - well, the WiFi link budget is designed around this - stations (clients) and access points (AP's). More power is is not helpful - it creates noise, not just for your stations, but for your neighbours - as there a limited amount of channels/spectrum for use, and it's a shared resource. More power to you is more noise for the guy next door - and his wifi will suffer for it, because he likely has someone on the other side as well...
so in 2.4Ghz:
lower power on the AP, better antenna's on the stations - good
high power on the AP - not good
and of course, goes without saying - wide channels in 2.4Ghz, definitely not good
ultimately, at the end of the day, WiFi in 2.4Ghz is not limited by the AP, but by the clients - and at 16-20dBm - High Power AP's are a waste of money in many applications in the SoHo environment.
sfx