I'm not sure what else can be done, I think it's clearly some issue on the Synology side
I would have to agree. Maybe I'm missing something that might be obvious to someone else though.
My Scenario: I have a couple TP-LINK TL-SG3424 switches. Since those were all I could afford, and yes, I know they are NOT on the Synology approved/tested list.
Anyway, with these as my main backbone with LAG enabled between them, meaning, my cable modem and router is at one end of the building, and my servers/Synology NAS (DS713+) is at the other end of the building, I have easily setup LAG for load balancing and failover between the two switches with the same (latest firmware). However, when I tried, several times mind you, to setup the DS713+ in IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic Link aggregation mode, it always failed. I'm not sure what error it threw at me. It was a while ago. Which reminds me, I haven't tried again since I updated the firmware a few weeks ago...hmm....
At the previous time, several months ago, setting the Synology in Network fault Tolerance (non-802.3ad network environment) worked fine. I never lost connection with the web interface while testing regardless of how I messed with it, thank gosh, but I just couldn't set it in link aggregation (IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic Link aggregation mode) no matter what I tried, or how I approached it.
I was happy with fault tolerance in the end then. While nothing earth shattering with the gigabit backbone, no special super computers or anything (actually low power asus eeebox PC's, I can easily get 60-75 megabytes per second read/write from the NAS with load balancing/fault tolerance in the switches, and in the Synology NAS.) That is when the network isn't so hammered with day to day business WAN access and OVPN traffic.
I know I'll be experimenting with LAN LAG in the near future. I have an rt-n66u now, last beta Merlin build, but I'll be switching to an rt-n68 if/when we get some magic happening in the future. Obviously my WAN connection is the slowest link in the chain, but all in all, some fault tolerance and load balancing isn't going to hurt anything at the router level too...
Last edited: