SomeWhereOverTheRainBow
Part of the Furniture
Great job man! Appears to function well.
x3mRouting x3mRouting ~ Selective Routing for Asuswrt-Merlin Firmware
- Thread starter Xentrk
- Start date
Xentrk
Part of the Furniture
Select option 4 to download the updated version of route_all_vpnserver.sh. I fixed the error handling for valid VPN Server and VPN Client instances.
Sorry to bother everyone again, As I mentioned in my previous post, I now have all the streaming services that I use working on my Router. However I am trying to replicate my set up on another Asus router for a family member. I understand that when I set this up at their location being that it is a different geographic location I may need to tweak the configuration, but right now it is in my house using my internet. it is a Slightly different router, mine is an RT-AC88U the 2nd router for my family memeber is a RT-AC3200. Both are running the same firmware 384.13-0. Since I have mine all working I assumed that if I took the nat-start file and set it up on the second router it should pull in all the ipsets and work the same as mine. that has not been the case though. below are the liststats output from both routers:
The only service that I am having issues with is Netflix all the oters are working fine. as you can see the Netflix ipset configured via the DNSMASQ method has significantly less IP addresses on the AC3200 than it does on the AC88U and there are a few more on the Netflix_AS2906 ASN method. SO i guess my question is is there a way I can export the ipset for netflix out of the AC88U and import it into the AC3200?
The only service that I am having issues with is Netflix all the oters are working fine. as you can see the Netflix ipset configured via the DNSMASQ method has significantly less IP addresses on the AC3200 than it does on the AC88U and there are a few more on the Netflix_AS2906 ASN method. SO i guess my question is is there a way I can export the ipset for netflix out of the AC88U and import it into the AC3200?
Martineau
Part of the Furniture
The point of using the dnsmasq method is that hopefully it will always be 'current' for the current locale - meaning any new IPs will always be added, but old/stale entries will not be removed.
It could be that on the AC88U some of the entries are redundant? i.e. only applicable/relevant to the locale.
NOTE: Netflix uses Amazon AWS as a initial touch point fed from regional Internet Exchange Points (IX) containing Open Connect Appliances (OCAs)
Some partner ISPs have Open Connect Appliances (OCAs) on their premises - basically once 'play' is pressed, Netflix content is streamed from the OCA rather than from the internet so streaming from the local OCA is preferred.
lazmo88
Occasional Visitor
@Xentrk great job on the VPN Server to VPN Client routing option! It seems so much easier set it up now.
That said, are you still exploring/working on the IPSET based routing from VPN Server to VPN Client option? That, would, be, game changer for many I believe
While setting up IPSET based routing for local LAN is a breeze, you won't have access to your complex setup when you are not home. If this would be possible it would be a breeze to keep your routing policies with you when you travel
I would be personally even willing to contribute in form of donation and I'm sure many others as well could display their appreciation with small donations to support the development
That said, are you still exploring/working on the IPSET based routing from VPN Server to VPN Client option? That, would, be, game changer for many I believe
While setting up IPSET based routing for local LAN is a breeze, you won't have access to your complex setup when you are not home. If this would be possible it would be a breeze to keep your routing policies with you when you travel
I would be personally even willing to contribute in form of donation and I'm sure many others as well could display their appreciation with small donations to support the development
Xentrk
Part of the Furniture
Thanks for the feedback.@Xentrk great job on the VPN Server to VPN Client routing option! It seems so much easier set it up now.
That said, are you still exploring/working on the IPSET based routing from VPN Server to VPN Client option? That, would, be, game changer for many I believe
While setting up IPSET based routing for local LAN is a breeze, you won't have access to your complex setup when you are not home. If this would be possible it would be a breeze to keep your routing policies with you when you travel
I would be personally even willing to contribute in form of donation and I'm sure many others as well could display their appreciation with small donations to support the development
I did code a script to implement the routing rules though. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to get the IPSET based routing from VPN Server to VPN Client to work. You can see the details in the post here. I have tried some different things with no success. Once I implement the rules, I can't access websites from a browser over the VPN Server connection. What I find strange is that I see pkts being passed to the iptables rule even though I can't access Pandora website in a browser. It just spins and eventually times out.
Martineau
Part of the Furniture
Still works for me.
Martineau
Part of the Furniture
What did you try?
Current configuration
Code:
./VPN_Client_Switch.sh 3 on
(VPN_Client_Switch.sh): 1736 v1.09 Request..... [3 on]
(VPN_Client_Switch.sh): 1736 No VPN ACTIVE - Starting VPN Client 3
Waiting for VPN Client 3 (VPNBook USA1) to connect.....
VPN Client 3 (VPNBook USA1) connect'd in 28 secs
VPN Client Status:
13:26:49 VPN end-point=unknown; Checking STUN servers (may take 10-30 seconds!)..... 13:26:59
Client 3 Connected via 10.10.0.154 (VPNBook USA1) VPN STUN tunnel end-point I/P: unknown
Checking response (max 5secs) from 'http://ipecho.net/plain' to verify VPN tunnel end-point I/P: unknown
VPN tunnel end-point I/P: 198.7.62.204
Inter-| Receive | Transmit
face |bytes packets errs drop fifo frame compressed multicast|bytes packets errs drop fifo colls carrier compressed
tun13: 3640778 3254 0 0 0 0 0 0 296193 3496 0 0 0 0 0 0
NOTE: OpenVPN Statistics logged to Syslog
Code:
ip rule
0: from all lookup local
9990: from all fwmark 0x8000/0x8000 lookup main
9995: from all fwmark 0x4000/0x4000 lookup ovpnc3
32766: from all lookup main
32767: from all lookup default
Code:
ip route show table 113
10.10.0.153 dev tun13 proto kernel scope link src 10.10.0.154
10.16.0.0/24 dev tun22 scope link
10.8.0.0/24 dev tun21 scope link
192.168.1.0/24 via 10.88.8.254 dev br0 metric 2
10.88.8.0/24 dev br0 proto kernel scope link src 10.88.8.1
10.0.0.0/8 dev br0 proto kernel scope link src 10.88.8.3
default via 10.10.0.153 dev tun13
Code:
iptables --line -t nat -nvL POSTROUTING
Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 9059 packets, 623K bytes)
num pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
1 0 0 MASQUERADE all -- * tun13 10.88.8.0/24 0.0.0.0/0
2 0 0 MASQUERADE all -- * tun1+ 10.16.0.0/24 0.0.0.0/0
3 56 2912 MASQUERADE all -- * tun1+ 10.8.0.0/24 0.0.0.0/0
<snip>
Code:
./OpenVPNServerStatus.sh list
There are 1 clients connected to OpenVPN Server 1 (Port xxxxx, IP Pool:10.8.0.0)
10.8.0.2 (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:50306) since Wed-Nov-20-14:41:27-2019
There are 0 clients connected to OpenVPN Server 2Attempt to open 'www.pandora.com' on remote OpenVPN device 10.8.0.2
Add IPSET fwmark rule for the remote OpenVPN device 10.8.0.2
Code:
iptables -t mangle -I PREROUTING -i tun21 -s 10.8.0.2 -m set --match-set pandora dst -j MARK --set-xmark 0x4000/0x4000
Code:
iptables -nvL PREROUTING -t mangle --line
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 258 packets, 61181 bytes)
num pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
1 208 17320 MARK all -- tun21 * 10.8.0.2 0.0.0.0/0 match-set pandora dst MARK or 0x4000
Last edited:
lazmo88
Occasional Visitor
Where do you get these scripts:
OpenVPNServerStatus.sh
VPN_Client_Switch.sh
These are not part of X3mRouting, and GUI initiated VPNC1 connection won't be displayed when issuing the following commands:
ip rule (no fwmark rules)
ip route show table 113 (empty response)
Martineau
Part of the Furniture
I wrote them.
The Selective Routing fwmark rules need to be added using a nat-start script or similar
My example shows I routed the IPSET via VPN Client 3.
So for VPN Client 1 table 111 (alias ovpnc1) would be used, table 112 (alias ovpnc2) for VPN Client 2 etc.
Xentrk
Part of the Furniture
The one item that jumps out at me when I compare my results with your's is the routing table output. I only show one entry whereas you have more than one entry.
Code:
ip route show table 115
default via 10.35.0.25 dev tun15Following are for all interfaces I have running.
Code:
ip route
1xx.xx.xxx.xx dev ppp0 proto kernel scope link
10.31.0.9 dev tun13 proto kernel scope link src 10.31.0.10
10.24.0.17 dev tun11 proto kernel scope link src 10.24.0.18
10.35.0.25 dev tun15 proto kernel scope link src 10.35.0.26
10.37.0.5 dev tun12 proto kernel scope link src 10.37.0.6
192.168.22.0/24 dev br0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.22.1
10.8.0.0/24 dev tun21 proto kernel scope link src 10.8.0.1
123.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 123.254.81.53
127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link
default via 1xx.xx.xxx.xx dev ppp0I entered the command to add the route for 10.8.0.0/24 to tun15 but there was no change.
Do you also need to add the 10.8.0.0/24 entry to the Policy Routing section in the VPN Client Screen and route it to the VPN like I do for all traffic? I tried it with and without the entry and still had problems. Thanks for the assistance.
Martineau
Part of the Furniture
NO, but even if you did, and created the resulting entry in the RPDB table, the VPN RPDB fwmark rule (if matched) would pre-empt it anyway.
Remember, Policy Routing will work for all processes running on the router itself, and for the local network, if it is masqueraded - hence we must manually masquerade the OpenVPN Servers (tun2+) subnet pool(s).
FYI, a crude confirmation method - on my remote OpenVPN device (Win10 laptop) you can use either tracert or the more informative (but slower! if target doesn't support PING) Powershell command:
e.g. Ignore the multiple consecutive 0.0.0.0 entries i.e. 'www.pandora.com' doesn't respond to PING ( try 'www.microsoft.com' to see a 'proper response!')
Code:
PS C:\Users\Martineau> Test-NetConnection www.pandora.com -TraceRoute
WARNING: Ping to 208.85.40.20 failed with status: TimedOut
WARNING: Trace route to destination 208.85.40.20 did not complete. Trace terminated :: 0.0.0.0
ComputerName : www.pandora.com
RemoteAddress : 208.85.40.20
InterfaceAlias : Ethernet
SourceAddress : 10.8.0.2
PingSucceeded : False
PingReplyDetails (RTT) : 0 ms
TraceRoute : 10.8.0.1
10.10.0.1
0.0.0.0
<snip>Xentrk
Part of the Furniture
Thanks @Martineau,
It works now! Your comment on the MASQUERADE rule was the key. I added the MASQUERADE POSTROUTING rule in combination with the PREROUTING RULE for PANDORA as follows:
Code:
iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -s 10.8.0.0/24 -o tun15 -j MASQUERADE
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i tun21 -m set --match-set PANDORA dst -j MARK --set-xmark 0x3000/0x3000lazmo88
Occasional Visitor
Can't wait
Martineau
Part of the Furniture
"Tell me and I'll forget; Show me and I may remember; Involve me and I'll understand"
Don't issue the script until you see the money!
P.S. I'll send you my bank details so you can forward all the donations.
Similar threads
DomainVPNRouting
Domain VPN Routing v3.0.4 ***Release***
Wireguard
Wireguard Client Help
DomainVPNRouting
Domain VPN Routing
Similar threads
Similar threads
-
How do I get x3mrouting working with AdGuard Home ?
- Started by ComputerSteve
- Replies: 6
-
x3mRouting x3mRouting vs Domain based VPN routing
- Started by Armandooooo
- Replies: 29
-
DomainVPNRouting Domain VPN Routing v3.0.4 ***Release***
- Started by Ranger802004
- Replies: 54
-
Question about DomainBased Routing & Re-connection
- Started by ComputerSteve
- Replies: 0
-
-
DomainVPNRouting Domain VPN Routing Question
- Started by Armandooooo
- Replies: 32
-
DomainVPNRouting Domain-based VPN routing script
- Started by johndoe85
- Replies: 2
-