D
Deleted member 77025
Guest
Dirty Update on 3x RT-AX88U, all running smoth
But GT-AXE11000 IS! FINALLY!GT-AX11000 is still not available..
Works perfectly for me - on both RT-AX86U and on RT-AC5300 ?
This on first aimesh node. Main router working fine.Works perfectly for me - on both RT-AX86U and on RT-AC5300 ?
View attachment 39638
View attachment 39639
Works on all three of mine - main router is RT-AX86U - 1st Node is RT-AX86U and 2nd Node is RT-AC5300This on first aimesh node. Main router working fine.
ok but you have 2nd nod RT-AC5300 I have 2nd nod RT-AC86U thats dfferent.Works on all three of mine - main router is RT-AX86U - 1st Node is RT-AX86U and 2nd Node is RT-AC5300
Same here, everything is OK, 22 devices connected (Pcs. android devices, alexas, TP Link cameras,.. ) without problemsDirty update on AX58U, no errors in the syslog and everything works as expected.
Feb 19 07:00:49 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 00:04:20:f1:b4:e7 IEEE 802.11: associated
Feb 19 07:00:49 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 74:40:bb:6b:ed:2b IEEE 802.11: disassociated
Feb 19 07:00:49 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 74:40:bb:6b:ed:2b IEEE 802.11: disassociated
Feb 19 07:00:52 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 74:40:bb:6b:ed:2b IEEE 802.11: associated
Feb 19 07:00:53 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 00:04:20:f1:b4:e7 IEEE 802.11: disassociated
Feb 19 07:00:53 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 00:04:20:f1:b4:e7 IEEE 802.11: disassociated
Feb 19 07:00:56 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 74:40:bb:6b:ed:2b IEEE 802.11: disassociated
Feb 19 07:00:56 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 74:40:bb:6b:ed:2b IEEE 802.11: disassociated
Feb 19 07:00:59 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 74:40:bb:6b:ed:2b IEEE 802.11: associated
Feb 19 07:01:03 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 74:40:bb:6b:ed:2b IEEE 802.11: disassociated
Feb 19 07:01:03 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 74:40:bb:6b:ed:2b IEEE 802.11: disassociated
Like every one here says....patience . ..we will see it soonWhat about GT-AX11000?
It can’t really be CAKE itself, since CAKE is only working on the WAN interface. But maybe the requirement to disable HW acceleration is impacting the LAN to LAN traffic. You can try enabling it manually to see if it restores the LAN throughput. But it’s not a solution, since CAKE won’t work properly with HW acceleration enabled.But the real issue is the impact Cake has of slowing LAN transfers to and from my NAS, and why this occurs on the AX86U and not the AC86U.
fc config --hw-accel 1
archerctl sysport_tm disable
fc enable
fc flush
fc config --hw-accel 0
archerctl sysport_tm enable
fc disable
fc flush
Oh right (I had me a simple moment) Corect, QoS does NOT impact (LAN<->LAN) transfers sorry, but if you Enable CAKE it has to disable HW acceleration right? You can easily check via... TOOLS> SYSTEM> NETWORK> HW acceleration. For CAKE to function... the Router CPU needs to process the network packets & you loose HW acceleration (Which reduces network speed).Adaptive QOS does not throttle LAN to LAN transfers only cake and traditional, the thing is though cake work best for my connection, gives me A+.
Adaptive somethimes give me B or A depending on the test run with bufferbloat, but Cake always give me A+ on my 50 DL and10 UL. But the real issue is the impact Cake has of slowing LAN transfers to and from my NAS, and why this occurs on the AX86U and not the AC86U.
Hope you didn't loose too much sleep.Clean load of alpha 2 on AXE11000
factory version -> Merlin version -> factory default and wipe jffs -> configure by hand
Only thing I am running into is the log file getting spammed with events from hostapd.
Code:Feb 19 07:00:49 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 00:04:20:f1:b4:e7 IEEE 802.11: associated Feb 19 07:00:49 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 74:40:bb:6b:ed:2b IEEE 802.11: disassociated Feb 19 07:00:49 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 74:40:bb:6b:ed:2b IEEE 802.11: disassociated Feb 19 07:00:52 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 74:40:bb:6b:ed:2b IEEE 802.11: associated Feb 19 07:00:53 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 00:04:20:f1:b4:e7 IEEE 802.11: disassociated Feb 19 07:00:53 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 00:04:20:f1:b4:e7 IEEE 802.11: disassociated Feb 19 07:00:56 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 74:40:bb:6b:ed:2b IEEE 802.11: disassociated Feb 19 07:00:56 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 74:40:bb:6b:ed:2b IEEE 802.11: disassociated Feb 19 07:00:59 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 74:40:bb:6b:ed:2b IEEE 802.11: associated Feb 19 07:01:03 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 74:40:bb:6b:ed:2b IEEE 802.11: disassociated Feb 19 07:01:03 mpu hostapd: eth6: STA 74:40:bb:6b:ed:2b IEEE 802.11: disassociated
I am guessing eth6 is one of the wireless interfaces and something is being an butt connecting or whatever.
Going to wrangle it in with scribe later.
EDIT: Hon Hai Precision Ind. Co.,Ltd.
EDIT: FoxCon
EDIT: Meh been up all night. Gonna dig some more after some sleep.
This alpha has been pretty solid from the start.I am planning on upgrading to alpha 2 this weekend. But before i do, i have 3 questions:
1. I know alphas are test versions. However are these full functioning? I assume yes.
2. Am i correct that when doing a dirty upgrade that I should unmount the usb and uninstall skynet ...do the upgrade...reboot...remount usb and reinstall sky net ? Or is this not necessary?
3. Is there a reason why dnsmasq was reverted back to 2.85 ?
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!