Respectfully I would like to thank @Jack Yaz for his development on Asus routers.
However I would like to pose a question on if his addon’s should be marked as deprecated or stale, or sunsetted if there is little development on the asus side.
Well I do see some git updates, going into the future with the newer codebases such as 3006, the question should be asked at some point if leaving addon’s with limited support on AMTM, should be listed without warnings. From a support standpoint without an active maintainer or development users on newer builds will have more support related issues with these addon’s. @thelonelycoder
Further if amtm could display in menu the last release date for the master branch of any addon for any developer that kind of information could be useful in determining compatibility before installing addon’s.
If Jack Yaz is maintaining his addon’s actively and I’m mistaken I apologize if this comes off as rude, I’m merely looking at this in a way to reduce support related issues or confusion to users.
Thanks.
However I would like to pose a question on if his addon’s should be marked as deprecated or stale, or sunsetted if there is little development on the asus side.
Well I do see some git updates, going into the future with the newer codebases such as 3006, the question should be asked at some point if leaving addon’s with limited support on AMTM, should be listed without warnings. From a support standpoint without an active maintainer or development users on newer builds will have more support related issues with these addon’s. @thelonelycoder
Further if amtm could display in menu the last release date for the master branch of any addon for any developer that kind of information could be useful in determining compatibility before installing addon’s.
If Jack Yaz is maintaining his addon’s actively and I’m mistaken I apologize if this comes off as rude, I’m merely looking at this in a way to reduce support related issues or confusion to users.
Thanks.
Last edited: